LaCroix v. U.S. Dist. Court for the W. Dist. of Ky.
Decision Date | 25 January 2016 |
Docket Number | No. 15–7199.,15–7199. |
Citation | 194 L.Ed.2d 2,136 S.Ct. 996 (Mem),577 U.S. 1117 |
Parties | Lori Rappaport LaCROIX, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY, et al. |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for a writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Roberts v. McGrory (In re McGrory)
...W. Dist. of Kentucky , 627 F. App'x 816, 819 (11th Cir. 2015), cert. dismissed sub nom. LaCroix v. U.S. Dist. Court for W. Dist. of Kentucky , 577 U.S. 1117, 136 S. Ct. 996, 996, 194 L.Ed.2d 2 (2016) (court "need not allow amendment where a more carefully drafted complaint could not state a......
-
Roberts v. Hopkins (In re Hopkins)
...W. Dist. of Kentucky , 627 F. App'x 816, 819 (11th Cir. 2015), cert. dismissed sub nom. LaCroix v. U.S. Dist. Court for W. Dist. of Kentucky , 577 U.S. 1117, 136 S. Ct. 996, 996, 194 L.Ed.2d 2 (2016) (court "need not allow amendment where a more carefully drafted complaint could not state a......