Lake v. Hancock

Decision Date04 June 1892
Citation29 Fla. 336,11 So. 97
PartiesLAKE v. HANCOCK.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Columbia county; JOHN F. WHITE, Judge.

Action by Minerva J. Hancock, for the use of J. W. Payne, against Asa Lake. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Plaintiff moves to dismiss. Motion denied.

Syllabus by the Court

SYLLABUS

An appeal will not be dismissed, on motion of appellee, for not filing the appeal transcript on the first day of the term to which the appeal is returnable, where the transcript has been filed before such motion is made, though subsequently to such day.

COUNSEL B. H. Palmer, for the motion.

B. B. Blackwell, opposed.

OPINION

RANEY, C.J.

The transcript was not filed till February 24, 1892. As the appeal was entered on December 3, 1891, the transcript should, properly, have been filed here on the first day of the present term, which was January 12, 1892. The motion to dismiss not being made, however, until May 9, 1892, which was after the filing of the transcript, it must be denied. Bingham v. Morris, 7 Cranch, 99; Pickett v. Legerwood, 7 Pet. 144; Sparrow v. Strong, 3 Wall. 97; Lumber Co. v. Ruge, 26 Fla. 59, 7 South. Rep. 373. The other grounds of the motion to dismiss, not being noticed in the brief, are abandoned. Jacksonville, T. & K. W. Ry. Co. v. Peninsular, etc., Manuf'g Co., 27 Fla. 1, 9 South. Rep. 661.

The motion is denied, and it will be so ordered.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Hoodless v. Jernigan
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • December 9, 1903
    ...7 So. 593; Jacksonville, T. & K. W. Ry. Co. v. Peninsular Land Transp. & Mfg. Co., 27 Fla. 1, 9 So. 661, 17 L. R. A. 33, 65; Lake v. Hancock, 29 Fla. 336, 11 So. 97; Johnson v. State, 29 Fla. 558, 10 So. 686; Blount v. State, 30 Fla. 287, 11 So. 547; McCall v. State, 31 Fla. 218, 12 So. 845......
  • American Sur. Co. of N.Y. v. Smith
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • October 27, 1930
    ... ... not the circuit court was technically in error, under the ... rule in Kimball Lumber Co. v. Ruge, 26 Fla. 59, 7 ... So. 373, and Lake v. Hancock, 29 Fla. 336, 11 So ... 97, in dismissing the appeal from the judgment of the civil ... court of record, the transcript of record upon ... ...
  • Silva v. Robinson
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • July 23, 1934
    ... ... error's brief and was therefore abandoned. [115 Fla. 832] ... Southern Express Co. v. Van Meter, 17 Fla. 783, 35 ... Am. Rep. 107; Lake v. Hancock, 29 Fla. 336, 11 So ... 97; Bloodworth v. A. H. & F. H. Lippincott, 78 Fla ... 261, 82 So. 827; City of West Palm Beach v. Ryder, ... ...
  • Mccook v. Caruthers
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • March 17, 1924
    ...of this court, considered as abandoned. Lamb v. State, 50 Fla. 106, 38 So. 906; Mathis v. State, 45 Fla. 46, 34 So. 287; Lake v. Hancock, 29 Fla. 336, 11 So. 97; Jordon v. Sayre, 24 Fla. 1, 3 So. The order overruling the demurrer is challenged on the ground that the bill is without equity, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT