Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy
| Docket Number | 87679-7 |
| Decision Date | 07 March 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
218 cases
-
West v. City of Tacoma
...¶88 We review summary judgment decisions de novo and perform the same inquiry as the trial court. Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc ., 176 Wash.2d 909, 922, 296 P.3d 860 (2013). Summary judgment is appropriate where there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is en......
-
Volk v. Demeerleer
...952 (1990). Unreliable testimony is not considered helpful to the trier of fact and should be excluded. Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy , Inc., 176 Wash.2d 909, 918, 296 P.3d 860 (2013) (citing Anderson v. Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc., 172 Wash.2d 593, 600, 260 P.3d 857 (2011) ). Importantly, spec......
-
Kosovan v. Omni Ins. Co.
...and all reasonable inferences arising from the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc. , 176 Wash.2d 909, 922, 296 P.3d 860 (2013). Summary judgment is properly granted where there are no genuine issues of material fact, and the moving par......
-
Maslonka v. Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1 of Pend Oreille Cnty.
...133 Notably, subsequent cases of inverse condemnation, have not followed the PUD's interpretation of Ackerman and Highline . For example, in Lakey the Supreme Court addressed the merits of the plaintiffs’ nuisance claim alongside the merits of their inverse condemnation claim. See generally......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...886, 83 P.3d 433, review denied, 152 Wn.2d 1015 (2004): 21.5(2)(c), 21.5(2)(e), 21.11(4) Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc., 176 Wn.2d 909, 296 P.3d 860 (2013): 12.7(6), 21.4(5), 21.13(2) Lambert v. Lambert, 66 Wn.2d 503, 403 P.2d 664 (1965): 12.9(7) LaMon v. Butler, 112 Wn.2d 193, 770 P.2d ......
-
§ 19.2 - Private Nuisance
...others gives rise to nuisance liability only when that conduct is unreasonable. Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc., 176 Wn.2d 909, 923-24, 296 P.3d 860 (2013) (dismissing property owner nuisance claims for public and private nuisance arising out of electromagnetic fields emanating from elect......
-
§ 12.7 Standard of Review Applied to Specific Rulings: Civil Cases
...as an expert and whether his or her testimony is helpful to the jury under ER 702. Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc., 176 Wn.2d 909, 919, 296 P.3d 860 (2013); Ma'ele v. Arrington, 111 Wn. App. 557, 563, 45 P.3d 557 (2002); see also Colwell v. Holy Family Hosp., 104 Wn. App. 606, 611-12, 15 ......
-
Table of Cases
...Wn. App. 886, 83 P.3d 433 (2004), review denied, 152 Wn.2d 1015 (2004): 13.1(1), 16.3(2) Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc., 176 Wn.2d 909, 296 P.3d 860 (2013): 17.3(1), 19.2(1), 19.2(6) Lands Council v. Wash. State Parks Recreation Comm'n, 176 Wn. App. 787, 309 P.3d 734 (2013): 1.6(1)(b) La......
Request a trial to view additional results