Lamb Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Erie, 16888.
| Decision Date | 21 June 1968 |
| Docket Number | No. 16888.,16888. |
| Citation | 396 F.2d 752 |
| Parties | LAMB ENTERPRISES, INC., a Delaware corporation, (Dispatch, Inc.), Appellant, v. CITY OF ERIE and Council of the City of Erie and Erie Television Corporation, (Intervenor in D. C.). |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
John M. Wolford, Dunn & Wolford, Erie, Pa., for appellant.
Edward A. Pastewka, Asst. City Solicitor, City of Erie, Erie, Pa., for appellee, City of Erie, etc.
John W. English, English, Bowler & Jenks, Erie, Pa., for appellee, Erie Television Corp., Intervenor in D. C. (Joseph M. Walsh, Jr., City Solicitor's Office, City of Erie, Erie, Pa., on the brief).
Before HASTIE, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.
An ordinance of the City of Erie, Pennsylvania, No. 39-1965, provides, as its title states, "for the granting of franchises for Community Antenna Television Systems; establishing regulations and conditions for the construction, maintenance and operation thereof; and the fees to be paid therefor and providing penalties for violations." The complaint in this case seeks to enjoin the city from enforcing this ordinance and from granting any franchise under it.
On first hearing, the district court granted a motion to dismiss the complaint. Dispatch, Inc. v. City of Erie, W.D.Pa., 1965, 249 F.Supp. 267. On appeal, this court vacated the order of dismissal and remanded the cause for trial. 364 F.2d 539.
Thereafter, in appropriate pretrial procedures and at trial the district court afforded the plaintiff all proper opportunity to establish its case. After final hearing, the court denied injunctive relief and dismissed the complaint. The court's findings and conclusions were incorporated in a full and lucid opinion.
We agree with the district court's reasoning and its decision, 286 F.Supp. 865. We cannot find that the challenged ordinance on its face is in derogation of federal power over television or any federal legislation or regulation applicable to the area in question.1 At the same time, the district court recognized, and so do we, that because the challenged ordinance has not been implemented, the question whether its actual operation will impose any undue burden on interstate commerce or infringe upon any federal province should be and is left open.
In addition, the district court found that the presently attempted anticipatory showing of harm to the plaintiff's existing enterprise in the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Connecticut Television, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
...of the state will be superseded. University Overland Express, Inc. v. Alsop, supra, 122 Conn. 287, 189 A. 458; Lamb Enterprises, Inc. Erie, 396 F.2d 752, 753 (3d Cir.). Since 1960, the federal communications commission would appear to have been feeling its way in asserting jurisdiction over......
-
Paragould Cablevision Inc. v. City of Paragould
...v. City of Erie, 249 F.Supp. 267 (W.D.Penn.1965); Lamb Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Erie, 286 F.Supp. 865 (W.D.Penn.1967), aff'd, 396 F.2d 752 (3d Cir.1967); United Artists Television, Inc. v. Fortnightly Corp., 377 F.2d 872 (2d Cir.1967); Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. v. F.C.C., 387 F.2d 220 (......
-
Ameron, Inc. v. US Army Corps of Engineers
...Co., 329 U.S. 129, 67 S.Ct. 231, 91 L.Ed. 128 (1946); Lamb Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Erie, 286 F.Supp. 865 (W.D.Pa. 1967), aff'd 396 F.2d 752 (3d Cir.1968). I turn then to defendant's proposed alternative ground for 31 U.S.C. Section 3553(d)(1) provides for a suspension of any activity r......
-
Borough of Scottdale v. National Cable Television Corp.
...Pix, Inc. v. Taylor, 304 F.Supp. 459 (D.Nev.1968), aff'd, 396 U.S. 556, 90 S.Ct. 749, 24 L.Ed.2d 746 (1970); Lamb Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Erie, 396 F.2d 752 (3d Cir. 1968). As to the legality of municipal control in Pennsylvania over charges by cable television companies, the starting ......