Landauer v. Hoagland

• Citation: 41 Kan. 520,21 P. 645
• Parties: JULIUS LANDAUER et al. v. N. HOAGLAND
• Decision Date: 10 May 1889
• Court: United States State Supreme Court of Kansas

21 P. 645

41 Kan. 520

JULIUS LANDAUER et al. v. N. HOAGLAND

Supreme Court of Kansas

May 10, 1889

Error from Wyandotte District Court.

THE opinion states the case.

Judgment affirmed.

D. B. Hadley, and J. W. Jenkins, for plaintiffs in error.

Hutchings & Keplinger, for defendant in error.

SIMPSON, C. All the Justices concurring.

OPINION

SIMPSON, C.:

The petition in error filed in this case contains eight assignments of error, which, as is alleged, occurred during the trial in the court below. These errors, to be considered by this court, must have been called to the attention of the trial court by a motion for a new trial; and the adverse ruling of the trial court on the motion for a new trial must be specifically assigned as error in the petition in error filed in this court. This has not been done. The action of the trial court in overruling the motion of plaintiffs in error for a new trial is not assigned as error here, and hence we cannot consider the questions discussed as to the introduction of evidence, the instructions, etc. (Carson v. Funk, 27 Kan. 524; Clark v. Schnur, 40 id. 72.)

It is recommended that the judgment be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

All the Justices concurring.