Landers v. Foster
| Decision Date | 12 April 1904 |
| Citation | Landers v. Foster, 34 Wash. 674, 76 P. 274 (Wash. 1904) |
| Parties | LANDERS v. FOSTER et al. |
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County; W. H. Snell, Judge.
Action by Clyde Landers against Harrison G. Foster and others.From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.Reversed.
E. W. Taylor and R. H. Lund, for appellant.
C. M Riddell, John A. Shackleford, and J. M. Ashton, for respondents.
The appellant invented an electric air heating fan, for which he made application to the United States Commissioner of Patents for a patent.Pending the issuance of the patent the following agreement was executed between the appellant and one Arthur E. Grafton:
On March 25, 1901, the date on which the option of Grafton expired, according to the complaint, the respondents, for the purpose of securing and carrying out the terms of the said option, entered into a contract which is stated in appellant's amended complaint as follows:
'(1) That prior to the ___ day of March, 1901, the plaintiff herein invented a certain electric air heating fan, and thereupon made application to the Commissioner of Patents of the United States, in Washington, D. C., for the issuance of a patent thereon.
'(2) That afterwards, and on the 5th day of March, 1902, the said Commissioner of Patents at Washington, D. C., according to the specifications referred to in plaintiff's Exhibit B, hereto attached, duly made an order allowing the said patent so applied for on the said electric air heating fan, and then and there directed that a patent issue therefor on the order of the parties applying therefor, or their successors or assigns.
'(3) That after said patent had been applied for, and before the same had been allowed, and on or about the 25th day of March, 1901, plaintiff herein entered into an agreement with the defendants, by the terms of which agreement plaintiff agreed to sell, and the defendants agreed to purchase from plaintiff, 51% of the said device.
'(4) That at the time of the making of the said agreement, it was agreed by the defendants and the plaintiff, in part consideration of the sale, and the transfer to them of the said 51% of the said electric air heating fan, that then the defendants, on their part, would pay or cause to be paid to the plaintiff the sum of $5,000, $1,000 to be in cash in hand, and the sum of $4,000 to be paid to the said Clyde Landers by the defendants as soon as a patent should be regularly granted by the Commissioner of Patents at Washington, D. C.All of which is more fully set forth in a certain memoranda and agreement made and entered into on the 5th day of March, 1901, by and between the defendantArthur E. Grafton and the plaintiff, giving to the said Grafton an option for the purchase of the said 51% of the said device, and the said Grafton then and there agreeing within the time specified to secure and pay to the plaintiff herein the said several sums of money therein designated, and in pursuance thereof, and in accordance with the terms of the said option and agreement, the said defendants, and all of them, accepted and approved the terms of the said agreement, and then and there, on the 25th day of March, 1901, agreed to and with the plaintiff herein that, in consideration of the transfer to them of the said 51% as set forth in the said option, that then they(the defendants), and each of them, would perform or cause to be performed each and every of the terms of said agreement, and fulfill its conditions and particulars, and in particular to pay to the plaintiff the sum of money as therein stated, and then and there did pay to the plaintiff the sum of $1,000, in accordance with the terms of the said option.A copy of the said agreement is attached hereto, and marked 'Exhibit A,' and incorporated in and made a part of this complaint for a more full and complete statement of the conditions therein.
'(5) That on the 25th of March, 1901, plaintiff herein, for the further purpose of carrying out said agreement and contract and under the direction of and at the request of the defendants herein, made and executed to the defendants, in the name of Harrison G. Foster, who was by the defendants nominated as representative of the said defendants herein, a bill of sale, wherein and whereby he conveyed to the said defendants, in the name of the said Harrison G. Foster, their trustee, and who was by the said defendants nominated and designated to accept and receive the said conveyance, the 51% interest in and to the said invention known as an 'electric air heating fan,' and for which the said patent had theretofore been applied for, and by the terms of which bill of sale the Commissioner of Patents at Washington, D. C., was authorized and directed to issue the said letters patent for the said electric air heating fan to the said Harrison G. Foster and to the said Clyde Landers, jointly, 51 per cent. thereof, and 49 per cent. thereof to the said Clyde Landers.All of which is more fully set forth in that certain bill of sale executed March 25, 1901, by the plaintiff herein to the said Harrison G. Foster, a copy of which is hereto attached, and marked 'Exhibit B,' and to which reference is hereby made, and incorporated and made a part of this...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Schuling v. Ervin
...Cas. Co. v. Washington P. C. Co., 63 Wash. 689 (116 P. 284); McDonald v. New World L. Ins. Co., 76 Wash. 488 (136 P. 702); Landers v. Foster, 34 Wash. 674, 76 P. 274: First T. & S. Bank v. Bloodworth, (Okla.) 174 545; Booth v. Barron, 29 A.D. 66 (51 N.Y.S. 391); Aimen v. Hardin, 60 Ind. 119......
-
Schuling v. Ervin
...71 N. Y. Supp. 744;Casualty Co. v. Washington, 63 Wash. 689, 116 Pac. 284;McDonald v. Ins. Co., 76 Wash. 488, 136 Pac. 702;Landers v. Foster, 34 Wash. 674, 76 Pac. 274;Bank v. Bloodworth, (Okl.) 174 Pac. 545;Booth v. Barron, 29 App. Div. 66, 51 N. Y. Supp. 391;Aimen v. Hardin, 60 Ind. 119;A......
-
Crown Controls, Inc. v. Smiley
...Hardman Estate, 77 Wash. 320, 137 P. 454 (1914); McDonald v. New World Life Ins. Co., 76 Wash. 488, 136 P. 702 (1913); Landers v. Foster, 34 Wash. 674, 76 P. 274 (1904); Roderick Timber Co. v. Willapa Harbor Cedar Prod., Inc., 29 Wash.App. 311, 627 P.2d 1352 (1981); Maxwell's Elec., Inc. v.......
-
Crown Controls, Inc. v. Smiley
...Hardman Estate, 77 Wash. 320, 137 P. 454 (1914); McDonald v. New World Life Ins. Co., 76 Wash. 488, 136 P. 702 (1913); Landers v. Foster, 34 Wash. 674, 76 P. 274 (1904). Generally, opinions issued by this court are binding on the lower courts until they are overruled. State v. Gore, 101 Was......