Landrigan v. Stewart, 00-99011.
| Decision Date | 14 February 2005 |
| Docket Number | No. 00-99011.,00-99011. |
| Citation | 397 F.3d 1235 |
| Parties | Jeffrey Timothy LANDRIGAN, a.k.a. Billy Patrick Wayne Hill, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry L. STEWART, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections; Dora B. Schriro, Director, Director of Arizona, Department of Corrections, Respondents-Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Dale A. Baich, Federal Public Defenders Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Kent E. Cattani, Office of the Attorney General Civil Division, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
1. Judge Silverman was recused.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Schriro v. Landrigan
...a unanimous panel of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed, but the full court granted rehearing en banc, Landrigan v. Stewart, 397 F.3d 1235 (2005), and reversed. The en banc Court of Appeals held that Landrigan was entitled to an evidentiary hearing because he raised a “colo......
-
Landrigan v. Schriro
...court's denial of the writ. Landrigan v. Stewart, 272 F.3d 1221, 1223 (9th Cir. 2001). We granted rehearing en banc. Landrigan v. Stewart, 397 F.3d 1235 (9th Cir. 2005).2 Since the district court's 1999 denial of the writ and Landrigan's request for an evidentiary hearing and the filing of ......
- Venetian Stone Works LLC v. Meccanica