Landrum v. Chippenham & Johnston-Willis Hosps.
| Docket Number | 101102 |
| Decision Date | 04 November 2011 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
186 cases
-
Stark v. Dinarany
...discretion. Galloway v. County of Northampton, 299 Va. 558, 563, 855 S.E.2d 848 (2021) (quoting Landrum v. Chippenham & Johnston-Willis Hosps., Inc., 282 Va. 346, 352, 717 S.E.2d 134 (2011) ). "When we say that a circuit court has discretion, we mean that ‘the [circuit] court has a range of......
-
Slusser v. Commonwealth
...are considered, but the court, in weighing those factors, commits a clear error of judgment. Landrum v. Chippenham & Johnston-Willis Hosps., Inc. , 282 Va. 346, 352, 717 S.E.2d 134 (2011) (quoting Kern v. TXO Prod. Corp. , 738 F.2d 968, 970 (8th Cir. 1984) ). A trial court, "by definition,"......
-
Lawlor v. Commonwealth
...disturbed as long as it stays within that range and is not influenced by any mistake of law.’ ” Landrum v. Chippenham & Johnston–Willis Hosps., Inc., 282 Va. 346, 352, 717 S.E.2d 134, 137 (2011) (quoting Kern v. TXO Production Corp., 738 F.2d 968, 970 (8th Cir.1984)); see also Evans, 514 F.......
-
MacDougall v. Levick
...by any mistake of law.’ " Id. at 212–13, 738 S.E.2d at 861 (alterations in original) (quoting Landrum v. Chippenham & Johnston–Willis Hosps., Inc., 282 Va. 346, 352, 717 S.E.2d 134, 137 (2011) ).The evidence established a mutually beneficial relationship. Levick was, indeed, a very good pro......
Get Started for Free
6 books & journal articles
-
11.4 Imposing Sanctions
...witness because the mother never served her with an interrogatory. Id.; see also Landrum v. Chippenham & Johnston-Willis Hosps., Inc., 282 Va. 346, 355, 717 S.E.2d 134, 138 (2011) (upholding exclusion of expert witnesses where counsel "failed to obey the circuit court's pretrial order").[11......
-
13.3 Appeal from Circuit Court to Court of Appeals
...150 (2008).[129] Chatman v. Commonwealth, 61 Va. App. 618, 739 S.E.2d 245 (2013).[130] Landrum v. Chippenham & Johnston-Willis Hosps., 282 Va. 346, 356 n.9, 717 S.E.2d 134, 139 n.9 (2011). Landrum may have overruled sub silentio the prior case of Hamilton Development Co. v. Broad Rock Club,......
-
Table Of Authorities
...v. Kerdasha, 271 Va. 646, 629 S.E.2d 181 (2006).............................216 Landrum v. Chippenham & Johnston-Willis Hosps., Inc., 282 Va. 346, 717 S.E.2d 134 (2011)...................................................................................... 11 Langman v. Alumni Ass'n of Un......
-
Table of Authorities
...302 (W.D. Va. 1998)......................................................135, 285 Landrum v. Chippenham & Johnston-Willis Hosps., Inc., 282 Va. 346, 717 S.E.2d 134 (2011)..........................................................................................340, 347-348 Lannon v. Lee Conn......
Get Started for Free