Lane v. Insurance Company of North America
| Decision Date | 02 May 1967 |
| Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 5899. |
| Parties | Mrs. Martha LANE v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Tennessee |
Harry J. Bryant, Knoxville, Tenn., for plaintiff.
Louis C. Woolf, Knoxville, Tenn., for defendant.
This a workmen's compensation case. The plaintiff, a citizen and resident of Tennessee, brought suit, as the Tennessee statute permits, directly against the insurance company rather than against the insured, a Tennessee corporation. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss citing 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1332(c) and the decision of this Court in Twin City Fire Insurance Co. v. Wilkerson, D.C., 247 F. Supp. 766, construing this statute.
In the case of Carvin v. Standard Accident Insurance Company, 253 F.Supp. 232 (D.C.E.D.Tenn.), Judge Wilson referred to the Wilkerson case and stated that it "merely holds that a policy of fire insurance is not `a policy of liability insurance' within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)."
In this case the insurer rather than the insured was sued under the language of the statute. Had the insured been sued there would have been no diversity of citizenship and there would have been no jurisdiction. The plaintiff has sought to do by indirection, that is by suit against the insurer, what he could not do directly. But the language of the statute covers this situation like a glove. The insurer was sued directly. Its insured was a citizen of Tennessee and by the terms of the statute, the insurer for purposes of the suit "* * * shall be deemed a citizen of the State of which the insured is a citizen * * *" In the opinion of the Court, there is clearly no diversity of citizenship.
It is ordered that the motion of defendant to dismiss the action be, and the same hereby is, granted.
The Court has been advised by Judge Frank Wilson of the United States District Court at Chattanooga, Tennessee, that he has had the same question in Vines v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, 267 F.Supp. 436, and reached the same decision.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
AJ Kellos Const. Co., Inc. v. Balboa Ins. Co.
...his employer's workman's compensation carrier. Hernandez v. Travelers Ins. Co., 489 F.2d 721 (5th Cir. 1974); Lane v. Insurance Co. of North Am., 268 F.Supp. 345 (E.D.Tenn.1967); Vines v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 267 F.Supp. 436 (E.D.Tenn.1967). It is fairly uniformly recogniz......
-
McMurry v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co.
...Co., 448 F.Supp. 1364, 1367 (E.D.Pa.1978). The statute has been applied in cases involving fire insurance, Lane v. Insurance Co. of N. America, 268 F.Supp. 345 (E.D.Tenn.1967); worker's compensation, Vines v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 267 F.Supp. 436 (E.D.Tenn. 1967); and chari......
-
Hernandez v. Travelers Insurance Company
...the meaning of § 1332(c). Vines v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., E.D.Tenn.1967, 267 F.Supp. 436; Lane v. Insurance Company of North America, E.D.Tenn.1967, 268 F. Supp. 345. In Vines, the court found first that a workman's compensation insurance policy was a "policy or contract of ......
-
Ford Motor Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America
...compensation claimant sued the compensation carrier rather than an employer who shared the plaintiff's citizenship. Lane v. Insurance Co. of North America, 268 F.Supp. 345 (E.D.Tenn.1967, per Taylor, J.); Vines v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 267 F.Supp. 436 (E.D.Tenn.1967, per Wi......