Lane v. Lane, 91-1828
Decision Date | 13 May 1992 |
Docket Number | No. 91-1828,91-1828 |
Citation | 599 So.2d 218 |
Parties | 17 Fla. L. Weekly D1221 Stephen LANE, Appellant, v. Julie LANE, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Gerald V. Walsh of Gerald V. Walsh, P.A., Coral Springs, for appellant.
Jerald A. Goldstein of Goldstein & Saturn, Boca Raton, for appellee.
Appellant-father appeals a judgment limiting his telephone contact with his son, restricting his visitation to supervised and otherwise domesticating a Michigan divorce decree which granted "reasonable" visitation.
The parties agreed at mediation to be bound by a psychologist's opinion as to supervised versus unsupervised visitation. That opinion (despite a failure to interview the child) and a second opinion of another psychologist both favored un supervised. The court refused to accept the mediation agreement and also rejected both psychologists' opinions. The court weighed the father's pre-dissolution Michigan convictions for child molestation and shoplifting, as well as a recent head injury and continued sequelae.
It is undisputed, and should be indisputable, that a trial court's responsibility to the child cannot be abdicated to any parent, any expert. That heavy responsibility mandates that a court is not bound by any agreement between parents, nor by the opinions of any expert or group of experts. See Sedell v. Sedell, 100 So.2d 639 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958); Bolton v. Gordon, 201 So.2d 754 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967). Nor can this court substitute its opinion for that of the trier of fact. Adams v. Adams, 376 So.2d 1204 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So.2d 1109 (Fla.1980); Smith v. Smith, 55 So.2d 735 (Fla.1951).
However, the rationale for such rule is the ability of the trial judge to observe the demeanor and personalities of the parties and witnesses, to discern delicate vibrations and hidden influences, and to interpret nuances that are invisible in a cold record. Custody and visitation are too important to both the child and parents to restrict a determination to a reading of unemotional and dispassionate words on a printed page.
In this case, the trial judge had no faces to read, no demeanor to evaluate, no searchlight of cross-examination to illuminate truth. The court had the printed reports of the experts and a novel time saver of some 14 pages of a "proffer" of stating the position of each parent. No hearing was held, where each side could present favorable evidence and refute the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Vinson v. Vinson
...point is predicated on the well-established law expressed in Higgins v. Higgins , 945 So.2d 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006), and Lane v. Lane , 599 So.2d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). We discuss the cases in reverse order below. First, it is clear that Florida courts respect separation agreements as long......
-
Yitzhari v. Yitzhari
...a court is not bound by any agreement between parents.'" Dorsett v. Dorsett, 902 So.2d 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)(quoting Lane v. Lane, 599 So.2d 218, 219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)). We do not, therefore, preclude consideration of matters relating to the parties' agreement or custody issues, if appr......
-
Adamson v. Chavis
...for that of the trier of fact. E.g., Dinkel v. Dinkel, 322 So.2d 22 (Fla.1975); In re Gregory, 313 So.2d 735 (Fla.1975); Lane v. Lane, 599 So.2d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Barnhill v. Barnhill, 353 So.2d 923 (Fla. 4th DCA The majority asserts that the trial court's decision "to limit visitati......
-
McAlister v. Shaver, 92-2960
...to the child cannot be abdicated to any parent or expert. A court is not bound by any agreement between parents. Lane v. Lane, 599 So.2d 218, 219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Bolton v. Gordon, 201 So.2d 754 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967); Sedell v. Sedell, 100 So.2d 639 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958). A trial court has ......
-
Alternative dispute resolution and settlement
...to child support and visitation, trial court was required to admit evidence relevant to best interests of children); Lane v. Lane, 599 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)(trial court is not bound by any agreement between parents or by opinions of any expert or group of experts when deciding chil......
-
Probable problematic pitfalls in preparing prenuptial agreements.
...(13) See FLA. STAT. [subsections] 732.701 and 732.502. (14) Feliciano v. Feliciano, 674 So. 2d 937 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1996); Lane v. Lane, 599 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1992); Margulies v. Margulies, 491 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1986). (15) White, 617 So. 2d 732. (16) Belcher v. Belcher, ......
-
Through the eyes of a child: impact and measures to protect children in high-conflict family law litigation.
...(2010). (25) Fla. Stat. [section]61.125(6) (2010). (26) McAlister v. Shaver, 633 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 5th D.C.A. 1994); Lane v. Lane, 599 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1992); Bolton v. Gordon, 201 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. (27) Fla. Stat. [section]61.125(1) (2010). (28) Id. (29) Fla. Stat. [sec......