Laney v. Dean
Decision Date | 23 January 1958 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 4 |
Citation | 100 So.2d 688,267 Ala. 129 |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Parties | John P. LANEY, Adm'r, et al. v. L. E. DEAN. |
Hugh A. Locke, Hugh A. Locke, Jr., and Ryburn H. Bailey, Birmingham, for appellants.
Lange, Simpson, Robinson & Somerville and J. G. Adams, Jr., Birmingham, for appellee.
E. E. Dean, who resided in Jefferson County, died in 1928. He left a will, made in January of that year, which was admitted to probate soon after his death.
In his will E. E. Dean appointed his son as sole executor and gave to him one half of the estate after the payment of funeral expenses and just debts.
The testator made disposition of the remainder of his property in Items Four and Five of his will, which read:
'Item Four
'Item Five
'In case I should die after January 1, 1938 it is my desire that said residue and balance of my property and estate shall go to my said daughter, Mrs. Evelyn Lacie Dean Laney, absolutely and in fee simple, if she be living at the time of my death; or if she be not living at the time of my death, then said property and estate to go to L. E. Dean, in trust for the use of my said five grandchildren in the same manner as hereinbefore set out.
Letters testamentary were duly issued to L. E. Dean. He acted as executor until his resignation in 1938, after which letters de bonis non with will annexed were granted to Basil A. Wood. In February of 1943, after the administration of the estate of E. E. Dean had been removed to the circuit court of Jefferson County, in equity, that court rendered a decree accepting Wood's resignation 'as and when his final account is filed and determined.' Wood was directed 'to file an accounting of his actions in the management of the affairs of the said estate * * *.' On September 13, 1943, Wood filed his report of his activities as administrator de bonis non and petition for final settlement.
On April 20, 1944, L. E. Dean and Mrs. Laney, the two principal beneficiaries under the will of E. E. Dean, signed the following written agreement:
'Whereas the said estate has been in court for a long time and substantial expenses and lawyers fees have been created and the administrator has been paid over Two Thousand ($2000) Dollars and there appears to be little likelihood of it being settled and the property distributed to the parties thereto without incurring greater expenses.
'By mutual consent it is agreed that the said estate shall be divided among the heirs and devisees as their interest appear in accordance with the conditions of the estate and the terms of the will taking into consideration the distributive share of said estate already received by Mrs. Lacey Laney, after all debts and costs of the administration have been paid, and they agree to execute conveyances to each other to carry out said division; and it is agreed that the said appraised value shall be the value to be used in so settling up the estate and in paying the amount of the indebtedness to L. E. Dean, the same as though the property had sold for division for the amount of the appraised value.
'It is further agreed the value set by these appraisers shall be binding on both parties and that if either party after the appraisal is made refuses to abide by the said appraisal, and the distribution made by their representatives and the umpire, that the court shall make an order approving said appraisal as an official appraisal of the court and appoint three commissioners to partition and distribute the property to L. E. Dean first as a creditor and then to the heirs and devisees as they may be entitled thereto under the condition of the estate and order of court based on value of property as shown by said appraisal.
'In witness whereof the parties hereto have set their hands and seals this 20th day of April, 1944.'
Thereafter on December 28, 1944, three prominent members of the appraisal committee of the Birmingham Real Estate Board made a report concerning the value which they had placed on most of the real estate remaining in and belonging to the estate of E. E. Dean, deceased. On February 5, 1945, Billy Laney appointed his mother, Mrs. Lacey Dean Laney, his agent and attorney in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Clanahan v. Morgan
...not be disturbed on appeal unless plainly and palpably wrong. Parrish v. Davis, 265 Ala. 522, 92 So.2d 897, and cases cited; Laney v. Dean, Ala., 100 So.2d 688, and cases We see no reason to encumber this opinion with the procedural history and the details of the background of this litigati......
-
O.S. v. E.S. (Ex parte O.S.)
...tested the validity of the judgments of other courts, including probate courts, on equitable grounds. See, e.g., Laney v. Dean, 267 Ala. 129, 136, 100 So.2d 688, 695 (1958) ("There is no doubt of the general jurisdiction of a court of equity to annul decrees of courts of competent jurisdict......
-
Grice v. Taylor
...unless the conclusion is clearly and palpably erroneous. This we can not say. Parrish v. Davis, 265 Ala. 522, 92 So.2d 897; Laney v. Dean, 267 Ala. 129, 100 So.2d 688. We are constrained to hold that the assignments of error are without Affirmed. LIVINGSTON, C. J., and MERRILL and HARWOOD, ......
-
Association of Plant Police of Ala., Birmingham Lodge No. 1 v. Association of Plant Police of Ala., Birmingham Lodge No. 1
...here unless palpably erroneous. Alabama Digest, Appeal and Error k1008(1); Talbot v. Braswell, 266 Ala. 578, 98 So.2d 7; Laney v. Dean, 267 Ala. 129, 100 So.2d 688; Farmers & Ginners Cotton Oil Co. v. Hogan, 267 Ala. 248, 100 So.2d 761; Coppett v. Monahan, 267 Ala. 572, 103 So.2d 169; Adams......