Laney v. State

Decision Date07 February 1895
CitationLaney v. State, 105 Ala. 105, 17 So. 107 (Ala. 1895)
PartiesLANEY v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Calhoun county; Le Roy F. Box, Judge.

Z. A Laney was convicted of violating Cr. Code, § 4031 prohibiting the "use of abusive, insulting or obscene language in the presence or hearing of any female," and appeals. Affirmed.

S. D G. Brothers, for appellant.

Wm. C Fitts, Atty. Gen., for the State.

COLEMAN J.

The defendant was convicted for a violation of section 4031 of the Criminal Code, which prohibits the "use of abusive insulting or obscene language in the presence or hearing of any female," etc. The evidence shows that the defendant, in company with two others, was riding along the public road, when he made use of profane and obscene language; that there were two ladies in a hack, traveling in the same direction, from 15 to 30 yards in his rear; and that the language used was heard by them. The defendant testified that he did not know that the hack was near them, or that there were any females present or within hearing distance, and this evidence was not controverted. Upon these facts the defendant requested the court to charge the jury, substantially, that if he did not know of the presence of any females, and had no...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Terry v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • January 28, 1947
    ...fact, if it be true, that the accused did not know of the presence of any females would not of itself excuse the offense. Laney v. State, 105 Ala. 105, 17 So. 107; v. State, 13 Ala.App. 186, 68 So. 585. The general affirmative charge for appellant constitutes the only other refused instruct......
  • Arden v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • December 19, 1912
  • Frolik v. State, 79-679
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • January 9, 1981
    ...in part, upon a concern for the sensitivities of females and was designed to protect females from insult at all times. Laney v. State, 105 Ala. 105, 17 So. 107 (1897); however, these laudable concerns to protect females as a class are no longer viable in light of the recent decisions of the......
  • Holcombe v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 26, 1908
    ... ... The ... phrase "in the presence of a female," as used in ... this statute, means "within range of the female's ... hearing." Brady v. State, supra; Sailors v ... State, 108 Ga. 35, 33 S.E. 813, 75 Am.St.Rep. 17; ... Henderson v. State, 63 Ala. 193; Laney v ... State, 105 Ala. 105, 17 So. 107. On this question the ... court charged that, if any females were present on the ... occasion in question, the presumption would be that their ... hearing was ordinarily good, and that they could have heard ... and did hear any language spoken loud ... ...
  • Get Started for Free