Lang v. Bank of Steele, 890141

Decision Date20 November 1989
Docket NumberNo. 890141,890141
Citation449 N.W.2d 826
PartiesUnpublished Disposition NOTICE: "SUMMARY DISPOSITION, SEE NORTH DAKOTA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE 35.1(a)." Ernest R. LANG, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BANK OF STEELE, Defendant and Appellee. CIV.
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

District Court, Burleigh County.

AFFIRMED.

Appeal from the District Court for Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable William F. Hodny, Judge.

Ernest R. Lang, pro se.

Kelsch, Kelsch, Ruff & Austin, Collins and Main, Mandan, for defendant and appellee; argued by Arlen M. Ruff.

MESCHKE, Justice.

Ernest Lang appealed from a judgment dismissing his claim against Bank of Steele for lack of evidence. Lang contended that facts recognized in the Bank's trial brief created "sufficient evidence" to avoid the Bank's motion for a directed verdict under NDRCivP 50(a). We conclude that there was insufficient evidence to show that the Bank wrongfully damaged Lang by failing to file a termination statement for its previously filed financing statement on Lang's property. Therefore, we affirm under NDRAppP 35.1(a)(6). Furthermore, this claim was considered and rejected in a prior lawsuit between the same parties. See Bank of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Lang v. Binstock
    • United States
    • North Dakota Court of Appeals
    • 17 January 2001
    ...464 (N.D.1991); Lang v. Binstock, 516 N.W.2d 300 (N.D.1991); Lang v. Bank of North Dakota, 453 N.W.2d 118 (N.D.1990); Lang v. Bank of Steele, 449 N.W.2d 826 (N.D.1989); Bank of Steele v. Lang, 441 N.W.2d 648 (N.D.1989); Lang v. Molbert, 442 N.W.2d 447 (N.D.1989); Bank of Steele v. Lang, 423......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT