Langan v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Cos.

Docket Number17-1605
Decision Date24 July 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
132 cases
  • In re Xyrem (Sodium Oxybate) Antitrust Litig.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • August 13, 2021
    ...Litig. , 907 F.3d 42, 50 (1st Cir. 2018) (holding same and collecting court of appeals precedent); Langan v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. , 897 F.3d 88, 93 (2d Cir. 2018) (same). Thus, it was reversible error for the Actelion district court to dismiss the class plaintiffs’ cla......
  • Anderson v. Credit One Bank (In re Anderson)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of New York
    • June 3, 2022
    ...are more substantial than the potential damages issues that may be subject to individualized proof. Langan v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Cos. , 897 F.3d 88, 96-97 (2d Cir. 2018). See also In re Biery , 543 B.R. at 300 ; In re Brannan , 485 B.R. at 459. This is highlighted by Credit One's ow......
  • In re McCormick & Co., Inc., Pepper Prods. Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • July 10, 2019
    ..."rests squarely with the plaintiffs." Klay, 382 F.3d at 1262 (citing Walsh, 807 F.2d at 1017 ); see also Langan v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Cos. , 897 F.3d 88, 96-97 (2d Cir. 2018) ("the party seeking certification has the ultimate burden to demonstrate that any variations in relevant sta......
  • Richards v. Direct Energy Servs., LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • February 4, 2019
    ...Richards from representing a class of plaintiffs with claims under Massachusetts law. But see Langan v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. , 897 F.3d 88, 96 (2d Cir. 2018) (holding that "whether a plaintiff can bring a class action under the state laws of multiple states is a questi......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • 15th Annual Workplace Class Action Litigation Report
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • January 9, 2019
    ...5, 2018) (settlement of wage & hour claims brought by the DOL on behalf of 2,400 employees against four ChinaLangan, et al. v. Johnson & Johnson, 897 F.3d 88 (2d Cir. 2018)). If a decision is unavailable in bound format, we have utilized a LEXIS cite from its electronic database (e.g., ......