Langenhorst v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

Decision Date07 October 2003
Docket NumberNo. 94836.,94836.
Citation277 Ill.Dec. 687,796 N.E.2d 1053,205 Ill.2d 586
PartiesRita LANGENHORST, etc., respondent, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, etc., et al., petitioners.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

In the exercise of this Court's supervisory authority, the Appellate Court, Fifth District, is directed to vacate its judgment in Langenhorst v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co. et al., case No. 5-02-0459. The appellate court is directed to reconsider its judgment in light of Dawdy v. Union Pacific R.R. Co. et al., case No. 93710, 207 Ill.2d 167, 278 Ill.Dec. 92, 797 N.E.2d 687, 2003 WL 21983273 (08/21/03), and First American Bank v. Guerine, 198 Ill.2d 511, 261 Ill.Dec. 763, 764 N.E.2d 54 (2002).

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Langenhorst v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • March 2, 2006
    ...First American Bank v. Guerine, 198 Ill.2d 511, 261 Ill.Dec. 763, 764 N.E.2d 54 (2002). See Langenhorst v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co., 205 Ill.2d 586, 277 Ill.Dec. 687, 796 N.E.2d 1053 (2003) (table). Upon reconsideration, the appellate court affirmed the circuit court's denial of defendants'......
  • Langenhorst v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • December 15, 2004
    ...and First American Bank v. Guerine, 198 Ill.2d 511, 261 Ill.Dec. 763, 764 N.E.2d 54 (2002). Langenhorst v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co., 205 Ill.2d 586, 277 Ill.Dec. 687, 796 N.E.2d 1053 (2003). This interlocutory appeal We must determine whether Judge Cueto abused the exercise of his discretio......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT