Langham's Estate v. Levy
Decision Date | 05 December 1946 |
Docket Number | No. 4380.,4380. |
Citation | 198 S.W.2d 747 |
Parties | LANGHAM'S ESTATE v. LEVY. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Jefferson County; W. Tom Kenna, Judge.
Suit by Sid Levy against the estate of James Biddle Langham, deceased, to recover damages for alleged breach of contract of lease. From a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
Charles S. Pipkin, of Beaumont, for appellant.
Geo. M. Sonfield, of Beaumont, for appellee.
On February 15, 1936, Emmett E. Langham, Onyx I. Langham and Oliver J. Todd, were the independent executors and trustees under the will of James Biddle Langham, deceased. The said Langham Estate was then the owner of the real property situated at the corner of Fannin and Orleans Streets in the City of Beaumont. By a written lease contract, dated February 15, 1936, such executors and trustees leased a portion of the Langham building situated on such property to Sid Levy for a term of six years, beginning April 1, 1936. By the terms of the lease contract, the lessors agreed to partition off from the building situated on the property a store room for the lessee on the corner, which store room was to have approximately 20 feet frontage on Orleans Street; lessors further agreed to construct an individual front for said store on Orleans Street, and further agreed that they would "either construct new floors or place the interior of said store room in good condition and redecorate the same suitable for the purpose of a gents' furnishing goods store, and will have the said room ready for occupancy by April 1, 1926." The lease contract reads as follows:
Sid Levy was at the time of the execution of said lease contract engaged in business in the Alexander building, in which location his lease contract expired May 1, 1936. The Langham building was not ready for occupancy on April 1, 1936, and Levy moved to another location in the Perl building the latter part of April or first part of May, 1936. Considerable conversation and correspondence passed between the parties at this time. The following six letters passed between the parties:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Freyer v. Michels
...the question is not material whether appellee demanded and was refused possession. In support of his view he cites Langham's Estate v. Levy, Tex.Civ.App., 198 S.W.2d 747 and Moore v. Mansfield, 182 Mass. 302, 65 N.E. 398. Neither of the cited cases is in In the Langham's Estate case the cou......
-
Birge v. Toppers Menswear, Inc., 17670
...of the leasehold for the unexpired term of the lease and reserved rentals stipulated therein.' Langham's Estate v. Levy, 198 S.W.2d 747, 756 (Tex.Civ.App., Beaumont 1946, writ ref'd n.r.e.); 51C C.J.S. Landlord & Tenant § 247(2), p. 644, citing Rainwater v. McGrew, 181 S.W.2d 103 (Tex.Civ.A......
-
McNabb v. Taylor Oil Field Rental Co.
...App.1929); Drummet v. Beal, 354 S.W.2d 701 (Tex.Civ.App.--Estland 1962, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Langham's Estate v. Levy, 198 S.W.2d 747 (Tex.Civ.App.--Beaumont 1947, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Walcott v. McNew, 62 S.W. 815 (Tex.Civ.App.1901, no writ); 35 Tex.Jur.2d, Landlord and Tenant, § Defendant, ......