Langley v. City of New York
Decision Date | 13 November 1972 |
Citation | 337 N.Y.S.2d 460,40 A.D.2d 844 |
Parties | Milton LANGLEY, Jr., Respondent, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Before MARTUSCELLO, Acting P.J., and GULOTTA, CHRIST, BRENNAN and BENJAMIN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action to recover damages for false arrest and false imprisonment, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered December 21, 1971 upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff.
Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and complaint dismissed.
At about midnight on May 18, 1966 the police of the defendant city went to a gas station in response to a call, where the attendant told them that two men, one armed with a pistol, had attempted to rob him. He stated that a struggle ensued during which he seized the gun and threw one of the men through a glass door and that the two men then ran away.
The attendant examined 'mug' shots but was unable to make a positive identification. Approximately two weeks later the attendant, while on an errand for his employer at a nearby automobile agency, saw plaintiff, an employee of that establishment, and recognized him to be the man he had struggled with. He called the police and plaintiff was taken into custody. Both plaintiff and the attendant were questioned by the police and by an assistant district attorney who was summoned to the station house. Plaintiff denied his guilt and it was established that he had reported to work on the morning following the robbery. The attendant was unwaivering in his identification throughout the proceedings. Plaintiff was arrested, arraigned, held for the grand jury and ultimately indicted. Approximately seven months later he was acquitted after a jury trial.
In our opinion, a verdict should have been directed in favor of defendant at the close of the evidence. The powers of arrest of a police officer were governed by section 177 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which provided, insofar as relevant:
'A peace officer may, without a warrant, arrest a person
4. When he has reasonable cause for believing that a felony has been committed, and that the person arrested has committed it, though it should afterward appear that no felony has been committed, or, if committed, that the person arrested did not commit it'.
There is no serious question here that there was reasonable cause to believe that a felony had been committed. Thus, the question of false arrest turns upon the issue of whether the facts were such as to constitute reasonable cause to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
ROBERTS BY ROBERTS v. City of New York
...... There is little support in the case law that a mere identification by the victim constitutes probable cause and a defense to a false arrest suit. Where there is case law, they were not decided at summary judgment. See, e.g., Langley v. City of New York, 40 A.D.2d 844, 337 N.Y.S.2d 460 (2d Dept.1972), (court finds positive identification by the victim who was "apparently trustworthy and had no reason to lie" sufficient to overturn a jury verdict for the Plaintiff on the law and facts finding that the evidence "established as a ......
-
Broughton v. State, 50612
......Susan M. Broughton, an infant, Respondent,. v. STATE of New York, Appellant. Donald SCHANBARGER, Appellant-Respondent,. v. Robert KELLOGG, Respondent-Appellant, and ... Donald Tirschwell, New City, for respondent in the first above-entitled action. Donald Schanbarger, appellant-respondent pro ... (See, e.g., Langley v. City of New York, 40 A.D.2d 844, 337 N.Y.S.2d 460, affd., 34 N.Y.2d 885, 359 N.Y.S.2d 281, 316 ......
-
Smith v. Nassau County
......Thomas F. SMITH, Appellant,. v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, Respondent. Court of Appeals of New York. March 28, 1974. [34 N.Y.2d 19] . Page 350. [311 N.E.2d 490] Jerome F. Matedero ...New York City Housing Auth., 10 N.Y.2d 30, 33, 217 N.Y.S.2d 31, 32, 176 N.E.2d 57, 58; Cicurel v. Mollet, 1 ... (Langley v. City of New York, 40 A.D.2d 844, 845, 337 N.Y.S.2d 460, 462; Day v. Levine, 181 App.Div. 261, ......
-
Feldman v. Town of Bethel
......City of New York, 60 N.Y.2d 78, 82, 468 N.Y.S.2d 453, 455 N.E.2d 1248). Although plaintiff did ...57 N.Y.2d 947, 457 N.Y.S.2d 241, 443 N.E.2d 489; Langley v. City of New York, 40 A.D.2d 844, 337 N.Y.S.2d 460, affd. 34 N.Y.2d 885, 359 N.Y.S.2d 281, 316 ......