Langley v. Prince
| Docket Number | 16-30486 |
| Decision Date | 06 June 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Start Your 7-day Trial
58 cases
-
Crawford v. Cain
...the res judicata rule" that long underpinned habeas "and then modifies it" by providing "narrow exceptions." Langley v. Prince , 926 F.3d 145, 155 (5th Cir. 2019) (en banc). As relevant here, Crawford must show the state court's adjudication of the claim "resulted in a decision that ... inv......
-
Canales v. Davis
...on other grounds by Ayestas v. Davis , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S. Ct. 1080, 200 L.Ed.2d 376 (2018) ; see also Langley v. Prince , 926 F.3d 145, 162 (5th Cir. 2019) (en banc) (holding that § 2254(d)(1) cannot be waived by the parties).6 Even when a claim-processing rule is written in mandatory la......
-
Sheppard v. Davis
...a de novo review standard—that [s]he is in custody in violation of the Constitution ... of the United States." Langley v. Prince , 926 F.3d 145, 163 (5th Cir. 2019) (en banc) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S.Ct. 2676, 206 L. Ed. 2d 826 (2020).9 See als......
-
United States v. Roberto Trinidad Del Carpio Frescas
...are so strict is because the state prisoner already had his direct appeal in the state system. See, e.g. , Langley v. Prince , 926 F.3d 145, 155–56 (5th Cir. 2019) (en banc). Fair enough. But it means the state prisoner never gets review of the forfeited error: Florida’s courts refused to c......
Request a trial to view additional results