Lara-Torres v. Gonzales
| Citation | 404 F.3d 1105 |
| Decision Date | 08 September 2004 |
| Docket Number | No. 03-70932.,No. 02-72329.,No. 03-70931.,02-72329.,03-70931.,03-70932. |
| Parties | Dagoberto LARA-TORRES; Erika Lara-Perez, Petitioners, v. Alberto GONZALES<SMALL><SUP>*</SUP></SMALL>, Attorney General, Respondent. Dagoberto Lara-Torres; Erika Lara-Perez, Petitioners, v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, Respondent. Dagoberto Lara-Torres; Erika Lara-Perez, Petitioners, v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, Respondent. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
Marc Van Der Hout, Van Der Hout, Brigagliano & Nightingale, San Francisco, CA, for the petitioners.
Russell J.E. Verby, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Agency Nos. A75-306-260, A75-306-476.
Before WALLACE, McKEOWN, Circuit Judges, and MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.**
The majority opinion filed September 8, 2004, slip op. 12991, and appearing at 383 F.3d 968 (9th Cir.2004), is hereby amended as follows:
1. Page 974, at end of second full paragraph, after citation to Iturribarria, 321 F.3d at 900-01, insert: "While this temporal distinction may not always be significant, in this case, Pineda's allegedly ineffective assistance did not undermine the fairness of the removal proceedings in part because it was given well before the prospect of a hearing materialized."
2. Page 975, at end of first paragraph: change "removed from the actual process itself" to "which does not undermine the fairness of the actual process itself"
With these amendments, Judge McKeown has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Wallace and Moskowitz have so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No subsequent petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.
* Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).
** Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Padilla-Padilla v. Gonzales
...Padillas, our case law precludes relief in this proceeding. In Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968 (9th Cir. 2004), amended by 404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2005), Mr. Pineda gave the same advice he gave to the Padillas to other aliens, with precisely the same result as in this case. We held in ......
-
Santiago–rodriguez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
...due process right to a fair hearing.” Lara–Torres v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004) (emphasis omitted), amended by 404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2005). “Ineffective assistance of counsel in a deportation proceeding is a denial of due process under the Fifth Amendment if the proceeding ......
-
Contreras v. Attorney Gen. of the United States
...to a removal proceeding does not taint the fairness of the removal hearing itself in violation of the Fifth Amendment), amended by 404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2005). Balam–Chuc, like the Contrerases, sought lawful permanent residency under 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i). He argued that his attorney failed t......
-
Hui Ran Mu v. Barr
...denying Mu’s motion to reconsider. See Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft , 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir. 2004), amended sub nom. Lara-Torres v. Gonzales , 404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir. 2005) (standard of review). Mu asserts that the BIA should have considered her passport, which she submitted on appeal to es......