Larabee v. Cook
Decision Date | 01 May 1899 |
Docket Number | 229 |
Citation | 61 P. 815,8 Kan.App. 776 |
Parties | J. D. LARABEE v. J. B. C. COOK |
Court | Kansas Court of Appeals |
Error from Stafford district court; ANSEL R. CLARK, judge. Affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
J. W Rose, for plaintiff in error.
Moseley & Dixon, for defendant in error.
J. D Larabee commenced an action in replevin against L. A. Hall, in the district court of Stafford county, to recover certain personal property on which Larabee held a chattel mortgage. A redelivery bond was executed, signed by J. B. C. Cook, defendant in error, and others, conditioned as follows:
"Now, we, the undersigned, residents of said county, bind ourselves to the said plaintiff in the sum of three thousand dollars, that said defendant shall deliver to the said plaintiff the property herein returned to him, if such delivery be adjudged, and pay all costs and damages awarded against him in said action."
The property was valued at $ 1080.76. Upon the final trial the amount of Larabee's interest in the property was found to be $ 924.16, with interest. The costs amounted to $ 474.92. Execution was issued, the costs were paid in full, $ 605.84 in cash was paid on Larabee's interest, and property described in the redelivery bond and valued at $ 231 was turned over to the sheriff by L. A. Hall. There was no judgment for damages. The issue in this case is clearly stated in the brief of defendant in error, as follows:
The contention of the defendant in error is correct. There was no judgment for damages. The property was described, itemized and a value placed on each article in the redelivery bond at the time it was executed. Under the conditions of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Vallancy v. Hunt
... ... Shinn, Replevin, § 679; Cobbey, Replevin, § 1389; ... Washington Ice Co. v. Webster, 125 U.S. 426, 31 ... L.Ed. 799, 8 S.Ct. 947; Larabee v. Cook, 8 Kan.App ... 776, 61 P. 815; Allen v. Fox, 51 N.Y. 562, 10 Am ... Rep. 641; Yelton v. Slinkard, 85 Ind. 190; Edwin ... v. Cox, ... ...
-
General Securities Company v. Hindes
... ... with the previous holdings of this court on analogous ... questions. (See Larabee v. Cook, 8 Kan.App. 776, 61 ... P. 815; Hays v. Closon, 20 Kan. 120; Edwards v ... Ellis, 27 Kan. 344, and allied cases collected in 12 A ... L ... ...
-
Leeper, Graves & Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Hobart
...secs. 1318, 1350; 7 Wait on Actions and Defenses, 598, 599; Frey v. Drahos (Neb.) 7 N. W. 454; Gans v. Woolfolk, 2 Mont. 458; Larabee v. Cook (Kan.) 61 P. 815; Washington Ice Company v. Webster, 125 U.S. 426. L. M. Keys and Ledbetter, Stuart & Bell, for defendant in error.--On validity of r......
-
Hallidie Machinery Co. v. Whidbey Island Sand & Gravel Co.
... ... decisions: Franks v. Matson, 211 Ill. 338, 71 N.E ... 1011; Yelton v. Slinkard, 85 Ind. 190; Larabee ... v. Cook, 8 Kan. App. 776, 61 P. 815; New England ... Furniture & Carpet Co. v. Bryant, 64 Minn. 256, 66 N.W ... 974; Allen ... ...