Larabee v. Dolley
Decision Date | 23 December 1909 |
Docket Number | 8,810,8,816,8,817. |
Citation | 175 F. 365 |
Parties | LARABEE v. DOLLEY, State Bank Com'r, et al. ASSARIA STATE BANK, OF ASSARIA, KAN., et al. v. SAME. ABILENE NAT. BANK, OF ABILENE, KAN., et al. v. SAME. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Kansas |
[Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Chester I. Long, J. W. Gleed, John L. Hunt, B. P. Waggener, and John L. Webster, for complainants.
F. S. Jackson, A. C. Mitchell, and G. H. Buckman, for defendants.
Separate bills of complaint have been presented in the above entitled and numbered cases, calling in question the constitutional validity of an act of the Legislature of this state (chapter 61 Laws of 1909), commonly known as the 'Bank Guaranty Law' of the state. By that act it is provided as follows:
by the bank commissioners, shall be filed with said bank commissioner, who shall, upon the filing of such resolution, make a rigid examination of the affairs of such bank, and if it is found to be solvent, to be properly managed and conducting its business in strict accordance with the banking law, he shall, after the bank shall have deposited with the state treasurer bonds or money as hereinafter provided, issue to such bank a certificate stating in substance that said bank has complied with the provisions of this act, and that its depositors are guaranteed by the bank depositors' guaranty fund of the state of Kansas, as herein provided.
guaranty fund with the state treasurer subject to the order of the bank commissioner, and the state treasurer shall issue his receipt therefor in triplicate, one to the bank, one to the auditor of state, and one to the bank commissioner; provided, that the minimum assessment to be required from any bank shall be twenty dollars; provided further, that any bank seeking to participate in the assessments and benefits of this act after the first annual assessment for the year 1910 shall have been made, shall be assessed an amount approximately equal to its proportionate share of the money then in the bank depositors' guaranty fund after all losses shall have been deducted, the amount of such assessment to be determined by the bank commissioner. The last above mentioned assessment, however, shall not be required of new banks formed by the reorganization or consolidation of banks which have previously complied with the terms of this act. Upon the deposit and acceptance of such bonds (or money) and the payment of said assessment, then the payment of such deposits of said bank as are specified in this act shall be guaranteed as herein provided, and the bank entitled to its certificate.
guaranty fund shall be approximately five hundred thousand dollars over and above the cash deposited in lieu of bonds, when he shall discontinue such assessments. Should such fund become depleted the bank commissioner shall make such additional assessments from time to time as may become necessary to maintain the same; provided, that not more than five such assessments of one-twentieth of one per cent each shall be made in any one calendar year. The treasurer of the state of Kansas shall hold this fund in the state depository banks as provided by law governing other state funds, subject to the order of the bank commissioner, to be countersigned by the auditor of state, for the payment of depositors of failed guaranteed banks, as hereinafter provided.
The state treasurer shall credit this fund quarterly with its proportionate share of interest received from state funds, computed at the minimum rate of interest provided by law, upon the average daily balance of said fund.
guaranty fund, in favor of each depositor for the balance due on such proof of claim as hereinafter provided. If at any time the available funds in the bank depositors' guaranty fund shall not be sufficient to pay all guaranteed deposits of any failed bank, the five assessments herein provided for having been made, the bank commissioner shall pay depositors pro rata and the remainder shall be paid when the next assessment is available; provided, however, that whenever the bank commissioner shall have paid any dividend to the depositors of any failed bank out of the bank depositors' guaranty fund, then all claims and rights of action of such depositors so paid shall revert to the bank commissioner for the benefit of said bank depositors' guaranty fund, until said fund shall have been fully reimbursed for payments made on...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Tyler v. Dane County, Wis.
...also between the state and the shareholders. This is settled law. Wilmington Railroad v. Reid, 13 Wall. 264, 20 L.Ed. 568; Larabee v. Dolley (C.C.) 175 F. 365, p. 390; Garey v. Mining Co., 32 Utah, 497, 91 P. 369, L.R.A. (N.S.) 554; Cook on Corporations (3d Ed.) Secs. 492 to 496, inclusive.......
-
Wegner v. First National Bank of Casselton
...Davis v. Elmira Sav. Bank, 161 U.S. 275, 40 L.Ed. 700; Easton v. Iowa 188 U.S. 220, 47 L.Ed. 452. To the same effect see Larabee v. Dolley, 175 F. 365; Elizabethtown First Nat. Bank v. Com. 143 Ky. 816, 137 S.W. 518; Nat. Bank v. Pennsylvania Fuel Co. 215 Pa. 115, 64 A. 374; Green v. Bennet......
-
Lowry, Ins. Com'r. v. City of Clarksdale
...Brewing Co. v. McGillivray, 104 F. 258; Grainger v. Douglas Park Jockey Club (C. C. A. 6), 148 F. 513, 8 A. & E. Cases, 997; Larabee v. Dolley, 175 F. 365; Moore Otis (C. C. A. 8), 275 F. 747; Savage v. Jones, 225 U.S. 501, 56 L.Ed. 1182; Clark v. Poor, 274 U.S. 554, 71 L.Ed. 1199; State v.......
-
State v. Clement National Bank
...burden, or subjects the resources of the bank to any considerable risk. In this connection a further and fuller reference may be had to Larabee v. Dolley, before cited. That case a bill in equity, brought to test the validity of a Kansas statute which provided for the creation of a "bank de......