El Laredo, Inc. v. Orr

Decision Date20 February 1959
Docket NumberNo. 15975,15975
Citation321 S.W.2d 624
PartiesEL LAREDO, INC., Appellant, v. William R. ORR, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Ross Hoffman and Edgar A. Lashly, Austin, for appellant.

J. Elwood Winters and Ernest May, Fort Worth, for appellee.

RENFRO, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order which overruled a plea of privilege.

Plaintiff's controverting affidavit sought to maintain venue in Tarrant County, under the provisions of Art. 1995, Sub. 23, Vernons' Ann.Civ.St., and alleged a written contract executed in Tarrant County.

Suit was for the value of professional services rendered by plaintiff to defendant.

The record shows defendant was a corporation. The contract between plaintiff and defendant was executed in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. At least seventy-five per cent of the work done by plaintiff under the contract was performed in Tarrant County.

Subdivision 23 provides, in part, that suit may be brought against a corporation in the county in which the cause of action or part thereof arose.

Within the meaning of said subdivision a cause of action against a private corporation for the breach of a contract consists of the contract itself and its breach; hence suit may be maintained in the county where the contract was made, or where it was breached. The requirement that a part of the cause of action shall have arisen in the county where the suit was brought is met by proof that the contract was made in that county. Gleason v. Southwestern Suger & Molasses Co., Tex.Civ.App., 214 S.W.2d 640;...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • G. & M. Products Corp. v. Clayton Specialties, Inc.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • February 4, 1965
    ...is made at the place where the offer of one of the contracting parties is accepted by the other party. See also El Laredo, Inc. v. Orr, Tex.Civ.App., 321 S.W.2d 624; Alamo Products Co. v. French, Tex.Civ.App., 316 S.W.2d 765; Jackson Brewing Co. v. Clarke, Tex.Civ.App., 346 S.W.2d 149; Sham......
  • Pool Co. v. Hydra-Rig, Inc.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • November 19, 1981
    ...no writ). A cause of action on a contract arises either within the county where the contract is made or where it is breached. El Laredo, Inc. v. Orr, 321 S.W.2d 624 (Tex.Civ.App.-Fort Worth 1959, no writ); Gleason v. Southwestern Sugar & Molasses Co., 214 S.W.2d 640 (Tex.Civ.App.-Waco 1948,......
  • Mid-West Oil Corp. v. Eisner, MID-WEST
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • November 11, 1960
    ...of execution of the contract in Taylor County supported the conclusion that a part of the cause of action arose there. El Laredo, Inc. v. Orr, Tex.Civ.App., 321 S.W.2d 624. The judgment is ...
  • Delhi Gas Pipeline Corp. v. Allgood
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • March 22, 1973
    ...was either made or breached in the county of suit to sustain venue in said county under the two subdivisions here involved. El Laredo, Inc. v. Orr, 321 S.W.2d 624 (Tex.Civ.App., Ft. Worth, 1959, n.w.h.); Cactus Petroleum Company v. Summers, 319 S.W.2d 729 (Tex.Civ.App., Amarillo, 1958, writ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT