Largin v. State
| Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | MINOR, Judge. |
| Decision Date | 16 December 2022 |
| Docket Number | CR-20-0228 |
| Citation | Largin v. State, CR-20-0228 (Ala. Crim. App. Dec 16, 2022) |
| Parties | James Largin v. State of Alabama |
Appeal from Tuscaloosa Circuit Court (CC-07-2129.60)
In this appeal from the denial of a Rule 32, Ala. R. Crim. P. petition, we consider whether James Largin had ineffective assistance of trial counsel in the proceedings that led to his capital-murder convictions and death sentences for killing his parents. Proving "the truism that regardless of the mitigation strategy that capital defense lawyers choose, they are often 'damned if they do, and damned if they don't' when their clients later assert claims of ineffective assistance of counsel during collateral review," Morton v Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, 684 F.3d 1157, 1161 (11th Cir. 2012), this appeal requires us to consider Largin's claim that his trial counsel were ineffective during the penalty phase for introducing evidence of Largin's personality disorder-evidence that the sentencing court found mitigating. Although this Court has often considered claims that trial counsel was ineffective for not introducing evidence of a defendant's personality disorder, we have never ruled that counsel was ineffective for introducing such evidence, and, under the circumstances of this case, we reject Largin's request that we do so. We also reject Largin's other ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims, and we affirm the judgment of the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court denying Largin's Rule 32 petition.
On direct appeal, this Court summarized the relevant facts from Largin's trial:
Largin v. State, 233 So.3d 374, 388-89 (Ala.Crim.App.2015). The jury convicted Largin of two counts of capital murder for killing his parents. See § 13A-5-40(a)(2), Ala. Code 1975 (), and § 13A-5-40(a)(10), Ala. Code 1975 ().
At the penalty phase, the defense offered evidence about (1) Largin's work history, (2) his upbringing and family life, (3) his problems with substance abuse and depression, and (4) his alleged personality disorder. (Trial R. 2215-2434.)[1] The defense also cited his lack of a significant criminal history. (Trial R. 2499.)
Largin presented testimony from his uncle, Mike Largin; Jonathan Friday, a former boyfriend of Largin's sister, Sheri; Largin's great aunt, Christine Largin; and Largin's cousin, Teresa O'Rourke. Their testimony suggested that Largin's household during his childhood was filled with arguing, fighting, and verbal abuse. (Trial R. 2215-51 2271-94, 2351-52.)
Largin also presented testimony from Dr. Karen Salekin, a clinical psychologist and mitigation specialist. Salekin testified that she interviewed Largin 4 times and interviewed 19 individuals, including family members, former employers, and family friends. (Trial R. 2301.) Dr. Salekin was unable to speak with Largin's sister, Sheri, or with Largin's ex-wife, Dixie. (Trial R. 2305.) Other individuals refused to talk to her. (Trial R. 2306-07.)
Dr. Salekin also reviewed "a large volume of medical records pertaining to [Largin's] mental health history, his hospitalizations at North Harbor, Indian River[s] [Community] Mental Health Center, the Crisis Stabilization Unit, Bryce Hospital, and Serenity Care." (Trial R. 2308.) Dr. Salekin testified that, beginning in 2006, Largin was hospitalized several times for attempting suicide or having suicidal thoughts. (Trial R. 2309.) On cross-examination, she testified that some of Largin's suicide attempts or "gestures" could have been "manipulation, a way to attention, … a way to get into the hospital to get help." (Trial R. 2353.) She testified that Largin's ingestion of antifreeze and then telling others about it was likely not an instance in which he "intended to kill himself." (Trial R. 2357.) But she testified about one suicide attempt:
Dr Salekin testified that the records showed that Largin had "clinical diagnoses" of "[m]ajor depression," "impulse control disorder," and "polysubstance abuse disorder." (Trial R. 2312.) Dr. Salekin testified that Largin did not have an official diagnosis of a personality disorder, but she said that his records referenced traits she described as "Cluster B" traits-"behaviors that tend to get people in trouble interpersonally because they are either-they can be insulting people, they can be very clingy and needy people, they can be very arrogant people"-and "Cluster C" traits. (Trial R. 2312-13.) Dr. Salekin said that individuals with "Cluster B personality disorders" generally have "wild" emotions, are...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting