Lark v. West, 15954.

Decision Date23 March 1961
Docket NumberNo. 15954.,15954.
Citation289 F.2d 898
PartiesEdwin F. LARK, Appellant, v. Vernon E. WEST, Chairman, et al., Committee on Admissions and Grievances, Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit

Mr. James J. Laughlin, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Mr. Roger Robb, Washington, D. C., for appellees.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, Chief Judge, and PRETTYMAN and BURGER, Circuit Judges.

Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied May 4, 1961.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a member of the bar of West Virginia, sought admission to the bar of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The Committee on Admissions and Grievances of that court, after affording appellant a full hearing at which he testified, and after conducting its own investigation, denied appellant admission to the bar. The Committee's action was based on the fact that while a member of the bar of West Virginia, appellant had been convicted for mail fraud arising out of his activities as an officer of a fraternal insurance organization. Appellant served seven years of a twelve year sentence after which he received a limited pardon which operated only to restore his civil rights. The Committee's report recited that appellant had been the principal defendant in the mail fraud case and that he received the most severe sentence of all those charged in the conspiracy. After full consideration of appellant's evidence, including his conduct since release, the Committee unanimously voted against recommending his admission.

The Committee quite properly refused to retry the merits of appellant's original conviction. The facts recited amply support the action of the Committee and of the District Court in denying appellant's petition for admission to engage in the practice of law in this jurisdiction. Cf. Carver v. Clephane, 1943, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 91, 137 F.2d 685. The order of the District Court granting summary judgment for the defendants is

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Galahad v. Weinshienk
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Colorado
    • 17 Enero 1983
    ...95 S.Ct. 1127, 43 L.Ed.2d 400 (1975); ... The same is true of admission to the district courts of the United States. See Lark v. West, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 157, 289 F.2d 898, cert. denied, 368 U.S. 865, 82 S.Ct. 114, 7 L.Ed.2d 63 (1961); In re Rappaport, 558 F.2d 87, 89 (2d Cir. 1977) (footnote......
  • Gonzales v. North Tp. of Lake County
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Indiana
    • 28 Julio 1992
    ...should they be given from the witness stand during the trial of a case." Lark v. West, 182 F.Supp. 794, 798 (D.D.C.), aff'd, 289 F.2d 898 (D.C.App. 1960), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 865, 82 S.Ct. 114, 7 L.Ed.2d 63 (1961). "It is clear that an affidavit made on information and belief cannot supp......
  • Matter of GLS
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • 5 Abril 1984
    ...of Merry Queen Transfer Corp., 269 F.Supp. 812, 813 (E.D.N.Y.1967); Lark v. West, 182 F.Supp. 794, 796 (D.D.C.1960), aff'd, 289 F.2d 898 (D.C.Cir.1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 865, 82 S.Ct. 114, 7 L.Ed.2d 63 (1961). Therefore, admission to the Bar of the highest court of Maryland does not a......
  • Brown v. McGarr
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • 20 Marzo 1984
    ...241 (5th Cir.1968); Galahad v. Weinshienk, 555 F.Supp. 1201, 1204 (D.Colo.1983); Lark v. West, 182 F.Supp. 794 (D.D.C.1960), aff'd, 289 F.2d 898 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 865, 82 S.Ct. 114, 7 L.Ed.2d 63 It is clear that district courts have the authority to regulate the admissions......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT