Larson v. Chicago
Decision Date | 04 April 1905 |
Citation | 103 N.W. 35,19 S.D. 284 |
Parties | FRED LARSON, et al. President and Trustees of the Town of Summit, and the Town of Summit, Plaintiffs and respondents, v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant and appellant. |
Court | South Dakota Supreme Court |
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant and appellant. South Dakota Supreme Court Appeal from Circuit Court, Roberts County, SD Hon. James H. McCoy, Judge Affirmed John H. Perry Attorney for appellant. J. J. Batterton and Barrington & Lane Attorneys for respondents. Opinion filed April 4, 1905
The dominant question presented by this appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and an order overruling a motion for a new trial is whether there has been an implied dedication and valid acceptance of that portion of Maple street which intersects the defendant’s right of way in the incorporated town of Summit, and which is now completely obstructed by a snow fence, depot, and platforms erected by the railway company in the year 1895. The material facts may be briefly stated thus: During the year 1881 appellant constructed its railroad directly westward across the Sisseton & Wahpeton Indian Reservation, which became subject to entry and settlement under the homestead laws of the United States about the 15th day of April, 1892, and, pursuant to the federal statute relating to town sites, the judge of the county court filed a declaratory statement of his intention to claim, for the use and benefit of its inhabitants, what now constitutes the duly established town site of Summit, situated on both sides of appellant’s right of way, and the same was duly surveyed, platted, and laid out into lots, blocks streets, and alleys, all of which have since been continuously claimed, used, and occupied for town site purposes. As shown by the recorded plat of the 80-acre tract constituting the town site, with reference to which the respective owner of lots and blocks have acquired unquestionable title, the streets all extend north and the south at right angles across appellant’s right of way, and over the main track and two side tracks within the corporate limits. Prior to the 15th day of April, 1892, the telegraph office, station house, and platforms of the company were located on what afterward became Beach street, one block west of Maple street, and after the reservation was opened for settlement all local shipments of merchandise and migrant movables were unloaded at that place. A witness who was a section foreman in that locality from 1882 until 1897, and is fully corroborated and by the undisputed evidence, testified in part as follows:
The uncontroverted testimony clearly shows that, until obstructed by the new depot in the fall of 1895, this Maple street crossing thus established was maintained by the company, and used by the public, as the exclusive thoroughfare for persons having occasion to cross the right of way in coming in, going out, or passing through the town, and practically all the business structures within the corporate limits were erected on Maple street with reference to such crossing. On behalf of the respondents, C. H. Lien testified as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial