Larson v. Larson, 8697

• Decision Date: 10 November 1944
• Docket Number: 8697
• Citation: 16 N.W.2d 307,70 S.D. 178
• Parties: PERCY F. LARSON, Respondent, v. EVELYN M. LARSON, Appellant.
• Court: South Dakota Supreme Court

70 SD 178 , 16 NW2d 307 (1944)

PERCY F. LARSON,Respondentv EVELYN M. LARSON,AppellantSouth Dakota Supreme Court Appeal from Circuit Court, Minnehaha County, SD Hon. Lucius J. Wall, Presiding Judge #8697—Reversed Louis H. Smith, Sioux Falls, SDAttorney for Appellant. Albert M. Freeman, Sioux Falls, SDAttorney for Respondent. Opinion Filed Nov 10, 1944

SMITH, Judge.

The custody of the two minor daughters of the parties was awarded to the wife during the school months in a decree dated June 28, 1941, which granted a divorce to the husband.The girls were then of the respective ages of eight and four.In February, 1942, the husband sought a modification of the decree.This application asked that the husband be awarded the absolute custody of the children.Before the matter was determined, on advice of counsel, the wife stipulated that the court might award the custody of the children to their paternal grandparents subject to visitation by the wife at times convenient to those custodians.The wife having since married made application for a further order of modification awarding the custody of the children to her.After hearing based on affidavits and oral testimony, the trial court denied the application of the wife and she has appealed.

The welfare of the children is the paramount consideration controlling tfieir disposition however and whenever the question of their custody arises.In resolving this delicate issue, the trial court has been aided by the impressions he has been able to form of each of the individuals concerned.Sound reason suggests that we should not interfere in the absence of a clear and abiding conviction that the broad discretion vested in that court has been abused.Weygand v. Weygand, 68 SD 1, 2, 297 NW 689;Houghton v. Houghton, 37 SD 184, 157 NW 316.

Our examination and re-examination of this record has been made in the light of these settled principles, and with a sympathetic understanding of the yearning of this mother for her children.That analysis has produced a solemn conviction that the welfare of these children will best be served by the overall provisions of this decree which, while placing them in the custody of the father and mother of the husband, operates in practical effect to shoulder the husband with responsibility for their well-being and upbringing.

Because we think a detailed statement of the considerations upon which our judgment rests can only be made...