Latronica v. Latronica

Decision Date10 June 1968
Docket NumberGen. No. 52776
Citation97 Ill.App.2d 332,240 N.E.2d 458
PartiesTheresa Marie LATRONICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald M. LATRONICA, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois

Stone, Bolotin & Pogrund, Chicago, Bertram A. Stone, Chicago, of counsel, for appellant.

No attorney for plaintiff-appellee.

ADESKO, Justice.

Plaintiff filed a complaint for separate maintenance. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss this complaint and subsequently filed an answer and appearance. The case was heard as a contested matter and plaintiff was granted a decree of separate maintenance.

The only post decree proceeding within 30 days after the entry of the decree was a petition for fees by the first attorney who represented plaintiff. A hearing on the petition was continued from time to time and on October 6, 1967, an order was entered vacating the decree of separate maintenance. No ruling was made regarding the attorney's fees. Defendant's subsequent petition to vacate the order of October 6, 1967, was denied and this appeal followed.

Defendant has filed his brief and abstract and complied with all the statutory requirements and rules of this court for prosecuting an appeal. No appearance or brief has been filed by appellee. This failure by appellee to comply with the rules of this court makes it unnecessary for us to discuss the case in full. We reverse the order of October 6, 1967, vacating the decree of separate maintenance. Parkside Realty Co. v. License Appeal Commission, 87 Ill.App.2d 374, 231 N.E.2d 654 (1967); Beinarauskas v. Beinarauskas, 91 Ill.App.2d 381, 234 N.E.2d 16 (1967); C.I.T. Corporation v. Blackwell, 281 Ill.App. 504 (1935).

The petition of plaintiff's first attorney, which sought an order of court with respect to the matter of fees, is remanded to the Circuit Court of Cook County for hearing.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded with directions.

BURMAN, P.J., and MURPHY, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • People v. Miezio
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 18 Diciembre 1968
    ... ... Latronica v. Latronica, 97 Ill.App.2d 332, 333, 240 N.E.2d 458. Such result, however, is not required ...         As we mentioned, the trial court ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT