Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 81-1367

Decision Date24 August 1982
Docket NumberNo. 81-1367,81-1367
PartiesNathan LAUFER and Norma Laufer, Appellants, v. NORMA FASHIONS, INC., Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Pedro Osvaldo Jimenez-Pages, Miami, for appellants.

Yvette G. Murphy, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

FERGUSON, Judge.

Appellants are the former president of appellee corporation and his wife. They appeal from an adverse judgment entered by the court without a jury on a complaint for breach of contract. The two points raised by this appeal are: (1) whether the contract was so ambiguous as to require the court to construe it as a factual issue, and if so (2) whether the trial court's resolution of the issue is supported by competent substantial evidence. We answer both questions affirmatively.

The undisputed facts are as follows: Appellants entered into a written agreement on July 15, 1977 to sell back to the corporation all of their shares of stock. The terms of the agreement required them to satisfy an outstanding loan obtained from the Small Business Administration (SBA), estimated by appellants to have an outstanding balance of approximately $6,200.00 as of the date of the agreement. 1 Appellants received $3,000.00 upon execution of the agreement and were to receive factory-finished products worth $5,000.00 from appellee after satisfying their contractual obligations.

The SBA loan--which is the center of the controversy--was initially made to appellants to start the business. It was secured by a mortgage on appellants' home. 2 Without the appellee corporation's knowledge or approval, appellant, Nathan Laufer, on July 14, 1977, one day prior to executing the agreement, wrote two checks from the corporate checking account (using bank counterchecks) payable to the SBA for a total amount of $2,724.00. These payments would have reduced the outstanding obligation from $9,170.00 to the $6,446.00 (approximately $6,200.00) amount which appellants represented as being due. 3 An officer of the bank on which the checks were drawn became suspicious of the unnumbered counterchecks, one of which was post-dated. He called an officer of appellee corporation and was instructed to dishonor the checks because (1) the checks were not authorized by the corporation and (2) the corporate account did not contain sufficient funds to cover the checks.

Since the loan still had not been fully satisfied (by the amount of the dishonored checks), the SBA threatened to levy against the corporation's equipment rather than foreclose the mortgage on appellants' home. To prevent interruption of the business, the corporation was forced to enter into an agreement with SBA to satisfy the balance on the loan.

The pertinent contract clause provides:

3. The stockholders shall within fifteen days from the execution of this instrument, satisfy that certain debt in the proximate amount of $6,200.00 presently owed to or guaranteed by The Small Business Administration, and submit proof of payment and liquidation of said debt. (emphasis supplied).

Appellant, Nathan Laufer, contends that on the date he signed the checks for payment of the loan from the corporation's account he was authorized as a corporate officer to do so, and that by terms of the agreement they were personally obligated to pay no more than $6,446.00 (approximately $6,200.00) of the outstanding SBA loan.

Although the agreement required appellants to satisfy their personal indebtedness to SBA, and fixed the amount at approximately $6,200.00, there was no agreement that appellee-corporation would be responsible for the amount of the loan which exceeded $6,200.00 thereby raising a sharply disputed issue as to which party was obligated to pay the difference....

To continue reading

Request your trial
67 cases
  • Tim Minn, Inc. v. Tim Hortons U.S. Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida
    • August 2, 2021
    ... ... Ins. Co., 29 So.3d 1000, 1005 (Fla. 2010)); Laufer ... v. Norma Fashions, Inc. , 418 So.2d 437, 439 (Fla. 3d DCA ... ...
  • Kelly v. Militana, 91-00242
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • September 3, 1991
    ...One Hundred Seventy-Second Collins Corp., 465 So.2d 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 476 So.2d 675 (Fla.1985); Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Green v. Hartley Realty Corp., 416 So.2d 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); In re Estate of Supplee, 247 So.2d 488 (Fla. 2d DC......
  • Antoniazzi v. Wardak
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • October 17, 2018
    ...for competent substantial evidence. Weisfeld-Ladd v. Estate of Ladd, 920 So.2d 1148, 1150 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ; Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). ANALYSIS 1. Whether the forum selection clause is permissive or mandatory We hold that the provision is mandatory ......
  • Ess-Food, Eksportslagteriernes Salgsforening v. Rupari Food Services, Inc., ESS-FOO
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • October 17, 1989
    ...evidence to support the trial court's factual determinations. Strawgate v. Turner, 339 So.2d 1112 (Fla.1976); Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), and its legal conclusions that, in various respects, Rupari was damaged by Ess-Food's breaches of contract. See W.W......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Re-examining the presumption in favor of arbitration in complex commercial cases.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 84 No. 3, March 2010
    • March 1, 2010
    ...be determined by the trier of fact, and is not to be determined upon a motion for summary judgment"); Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So. 2d 437, 439 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1982) ("A phrase in a contract is ambiguous when it is uncertain of meaning and (16) Seifert, 760 So. 2d at 636; see also......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT