Laughlin v. United States
| Decision Date | 29 April 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 85-5189,85-5189 |
| Parties | Lamont Julius McLAUGHLIN, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
On the basis of his display of an unloaded handgun in the course of a bank robbery, petitioner was convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d), which provides an enhanced penalty for assault by use of a "dangerous weapon" during a bank robbery.
Held: An unloaded handgun is a "dangerous weapon" within the meaning of § 2113(d). Pp. 17-18.
Affirmed.
Stephen J. Cribari, Baltimore, Md., for petitioner.
Christopher J. Wright, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
The question presented is whether an unloaded handgun is a "dangerous weapon" within the meaning of the federal bank robbery statute.
At about 9:30 a.m. on July 26, 1984, petitioner and a companion, both wearing stocking masks and gloves, entered a bank in Baltimore. Petitioner thereupon displayed a dark handgun and ordered everyone in the bank to put his hands up and not to move. While petitioner remained in the lobby area holding the gun, his companion vaulted the counter and placed about $3,400 in a brown paper bag. The two robbers were apprehended by a police officer as they left the bank. Petitioner's gun was not loaded.
Petitioner pleaded guilty to charges of bank robbery and bank larceny and, on the basis of stipulated evidence, was found guilty of assault during a bank robbery "by the use of a dangerous weapon." 1 The latter conviction depends on the validity of the District Court's conclusion that petitioner's unloaded gun was a "dangerous weapon" within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d). The Court of Appeals agreed with the District Court, and so do we.2
Three reasons, each independently sufficient, support the conclusion that an unloaded gun is a "dangerous weapon." First, a gun is an article that is typically and characteristically dangerous; the use for which it is manufactured and sold is a dangerous one, and the law reasonably may presume that such an article is always dangerous even though it may not be armed at a particular time or place. In addition, the display of a gun instills fear in the average citizen; 3 as a consequence, it creates an immediate danger that a violent response will ensue. Finally, a gun can cause harm when used as a bludgeon.
1 The federal bank robbery statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2113, provides in pertinent part:
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Price-Williams
...court.100 There are cases of the United States Supreme Court that suggest that possession of a gun is inherently dangerous. In McLaughlin v. United States , the Court held that an unloaded weapon was a dangerous weapon.101 The McLaughlin Court declared that "a gun is an article that is typi......
-
Bowers v. Hardwick
...be viewed as "[v]ictimless," ante, at 195: drugs and weapons are inherently dangerous, see, e.g., McLaughlin v. United States, 476 U.S. 16, 106 S.Ct. 1677, 90 L.Ed.2d 15 (1986), and for property to be "stolen," someone must have been wrongfully deprived of it. Nothing in the record before t......
-
Brooks v. State
...by Means of Toy or Simulated Gun or Pistol, 81 A.L.R.3d 1006 (1977). The United States Supreme Court in McLaughlin v. United States, 476 U.S. 16, 106 S.Ct. 1677, 90 L.Ed.2d 15 (1986), interpreted the federal bank robbery statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(d) (West 1984). The Court held [t]hree rea......
-
U.S. v. Hamrick
...that the bomb was a dangerous weapon under existing Supreme Court precedent, and in particular under McLaughlin v. United States, 476 U.S. 16, 106 S.Ct. 1677, 90 L.Ed.2d 15 (1986). We believe that counsel was correct to concede this In McLaughlin, a unanimous Supreme Court held, in an opini......
-
The constitutionality of social cost.
...dissenting). (145.) Id. (146.) Id. (147.) Id at 3107-08. This language mirrors Justice Stevens's opinion in McLaughlin v. United States, 476 U.S. 16, 17-18 (1986) ("Three reasons, each independently sufficient, support the conclusion that an unloaded gun is a 'dangerous weapon.' First, a gu......
-
Pronouncements of the U.s. Supreme Court Relating to the Criminal Law Field: 1985-1986
...AND CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION A. Federal Criminal Statutes 1. Unloaded Gun a "Dangerous Weapon": McLaughlin v. United States, 106 S. Ct. 1677, 90 L. Ed. 2d 15 (1986) For purposes of the federal bank robbery statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2113, which imposes a sanction on those who commit assault ......
-
Nonlethal self-defense, (almost entirely) nonlethal weapons, and the rights to keep and bear arms and defend life.
...-1205(1) (2008). (171.) See, e.g., United States v. Wallace, 800 F.2d 1509, 1513 (9th Cir. 1986) (citing McLaughlin v. United States, 476 U.S. 16, 17 (1986)); State v. Geier, 484 N.W.2d 167, 17172 (Iowa 1992) (citing State v. Evans, 806 P.2d 512, 516-17 (Mont. 1991)). (172.) Neill, 166 F.3d......