Lavelle v. Schultz, 558P95
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina |
| Citation | 342 N.C. 656,467 S.E.2d 715 |
| Docket Number | No. 558P95,558P95 |
| Parties | Stacey LAVELLE, and husband, Allen Lavelle v. David B. SCHULTZ and wife Karen C. Schultz; Town of Hope Mills, a Municipal Corporation; and United Realty of Fayetteville, Inc., a Corporation. |
| Decision Date | 08 February 1996 |
Charles D. Mast, Bradley N. Schulz, Smithfield, for Lavelle.
Jerry A. Allen, Jr., Goldsboro, for Schultzs.
Gary S. Parsons, Kenyann G. Brown, Raleigh, for Town of Hope Mills.
T. Alan Pittman, Fayetteville, for United Realty of Fayetteville.
Prior report: 120 N.C.App. 857, 463 S.E.2d 567.
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of February 1996."
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bradley v. Gay, COA09-1723
...to show one of the elements of negligence." Lavelle v. Schultz, 120 N.C. App. 857, 859, 463 S.E.2d 567, 569 (1995), disc. rev. denied, 342 N.C. 656, 467 S.E.2d 715 (1996) (citing Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp., 308 N.C. 419, 425, 302 S.E.2d 868, 871 (1983)). See also McCullough v. Amoco Oil ......
-
Walden v. Morgan, COA05-1560
...762, 764, 529 S.E.2d 691, 692 (2000) (quoting Lavelle v. Schultz, 120 N.C. App. 857, 859, 463 S.E.2d 567, 569 (1995), disc. rev. denied, 342 N.C. 656, 467 S.E.2d 715 No evidence in the record shows any response by plaintiffs to BRC's and Basyooni's motions for summary judgment other than th......
-
Asher v. Huneycutt
...was probable under the circumstances. Lavelle v. Schultz , 120 N.C. App. 857, 859–60, 463 S.E.2d 567, 569 (1995), disc. review denied , 342 N.C. 656, 467 S.E.2d 715 (1996). ¶ 29 Landowners in particular have a nondelegable "duty to exercise reasonable care in the maintenance of their premis......
-
Novack v. Kosciuszko
...was probable under the circumstances. Lavelle v. Schultz , 120 N.C. App. 857, 859-60, 463 S.E.2d 567, 569 (1995), disc. review denied , 342 N.C. 656, 467 S.E.2d 715 (1996).Landowners in particular have a nondelegable duty "to exercise reasonable care in the maintenance of their premises for......