Law Offices of Herssein and Herssein, P.A. v. United Services Automobile Association, 082317 FLCA3, 3D17-1421
|Opinion Judge:||LOGUE, J.|
|Party Name:||Law Offices of Herssein and Herssein, P.A., etc., et al., Petitioners, v. United Services Automobile Association, Respondent.|
|Attorney:||Herssein Law Group, and Reuven Herssein, for petitioners. Shutts & Bowen LLP, and Frank A. Zacherl and Patrick G. Brugger, for respondent.|
|Judge Panel:||Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.|
|Case Date:||August 23, 2017|
|Court:||Florida Court of Appeals|
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
A Case of Original Jurisdiction - Prohibition Lower Tribunal No. 15-15825.
Herssein Law Group, and Reuven Herssein, for petitioners.
Shutts & Bowen LLP, and Frank A. Zacherl and Patrick G. Brugger, for respondent.
Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.
The Law offices of Herssein and Herssein, P.A. (Herssein Firm) and Reuven Herssein, petition this court for a writ of prohibition to disqualify the trial court judge below. We deny the petition. Although Petitioners raise three grounds, we write only to address the petitioners' argument that the trial court judge should be disqualified because the judge is a Facebook "friend" with a lawyer representing a potential witness and potential party in the pending litigation.
The Herssein Firm sued its former client, United Services Automobile Association (USAA), for breach of contract and fraud. In the course of the litigation, Herssein accused one of USAA's executives of witness tampering and has indicated that the executive is a potential witness and a potential defendant. In response, USAA hired Israel Reyes, an ex-circuit court judge, to represent the executive.
On June 8, 2017, the Herssein Firm filed a motion to disqualify the trial judge. The motion is based in part on the fact that Reyes is listed as a "friend" on the trial judge's personal Facebook page. In support of the motion, Iris J. Herssein and Reuven Herssein, president and vice president of the Herssein Firm, signed affidavits in which they swore, "[b]ecause [the trial judge] is Facebook friends with Reyes, [the executive's] personal attorney, I have a well-grounded fear of not receiving a fair and impartial trial. Further, based on [the trial judge] being Facebook friends with Reyes, I . . . believe that Reyes, [the executive's] lawyer has influenced [the trial judge]." The trial court denied the disqualification motion, and the Herssein Firm filed this petition for writ of prohibition.
The test for determining the legal sufficiency of a motion for disqualification is whether "the facts alleged (which must be taken as true) would prompt a reasonably prudent person to fear that he could not get a fair and impartial trial." Molina v. Perez, 187 So.3d 909, 909 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (quoting Brofman v. Fla. Hearing Care Ctr., Inc., 703 So.2d 1191, 1192 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)). Our review of the facts focuses on "the reasonable effect on the party seeking disqualification, not the subjective intent of the judge." Haas v. Davis, 37 So.3d 983, 983 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (quoting Vivas v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 789 So.2d 1252, 1253 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)).
The issue in this case is therefore whether a reasonably prudent person would fear that he or she could not get a fair and impartial trial because the judge is a Facebook friend with a lawyer who represents a potential witness and party to the lawsuit. At the outset, we note as a general matter, that "allegations of mere 'friendship' with an attorney or an interested party have been deemed insufficient to disqualify a judge." Smith v. Santa Rosa Island Auth., 729 So.2d 944, 946 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Indeed...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP