Law v. Eugene Kim, an Individual, & Snell & Wilmer L. L.P.
| Decision Date | 13 August 2015 |
| Docket Number | Court of Appeals No. 14CA1161 |
| Citation | 2015 COA 114,360 P.3d 247 |
| Parties | LEDROIT LAW, a Canadian law firm, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Eugene KIM, an individual, and Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., an Arizona limited liability partnership, Defendants–Appellants. |
| Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
State of the Netherlands v. MD Helicopters, Inc.
...judicial precedents, and accepted legal principles," or "[t]he set of rules or principles dealing with a specific area of a legal system"); Law , Webster's Third New International Dictionary (3d ed. 2002) (defining "law" in relevant part as an "ordinance, statute, resolution, rule [or] judi......
-
In re Runge
...C.R.C.P. 16.2. ¶ 15 We review de novo whether the district court applied the correct standard in dismissing wife's motion. See Ledroit Law v. Kim , 2015 COA 114, ¶ 47, 360 P.3d 247. ¶ 16 Under the "plausibility" standard from Warne , a complaint must "state a claim for relief that is plausi......
-
Woodbridge Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Lo Viento Blanco, LLC
...of the case or otherwise failed to apply correct legal principles — both of which Lo Viento asserts — are two such issues. See Ledroit Law v. Kim , 2015 COA 114, ¶ 47, 360 P.3d 247 ; Hardesty v. Pino , 222 P.3d 336, 339 (Colo. App. 2009).3. Application: Woodbridge Proved Adverse Use¶ 26 Lo ......
-
Ramstetter v. Hostetler (In re Estate of Ramstetter)
...its decision is being asked.") (citation omitted).¶ 68 True enough, "talismanic language" is not required to preserve a claim. Ledroit Law v. Kim, 2015 COA 114, ¶ 48, 360 P.3d 247 (citation omitted). And Karol and Marie correctly point out that raising the "sum and substance" of an argument......
Request a trial to view additional results