Law v. Mills

Decision Date20 November 1851
Citation18 Pa. 185
PartiesLaw <I>versus</I> Mills.
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

The only objection made against the assignment of the 17th November, 1849, executed by Joy and Webster, is that it is in contravention of our law, which forbids all attempts by an insolvent debtor to prefer one or more of his creditors before others. But our statute does not entirely invalidate assignments in trust for creditors, directing preferences. It simply enacts, that such a direction is to be disregarded, leaving the assignment to operate for the equal benefit of all the creditors. Yet were this otherwise, it is settled by Speed v. May (5 Harris 91), following prior determinations, that the validity of a voluntary assignment in trust, is to be ascertained by the law of the place of its origin. In ordinary contracts, the lex loci contractus determines their binding effect. And the same rule governs transfers of movable property and choses in action. No attempt was made to show that the assignment in question contravenes the law of the state where it originated. Consequently, the determination of the Court below, sustaining the right of the assignees, is well founded.

Judgment affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Smead v. Chandler
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • June 6, 1903
    ...if it has been executed by a transfer of possession. 13 Cal. 242; 54 N.Y. 29; 81 Wis. 291; 147 U.S. 473; 13 N.J.L. 325; 4 La.Ann. 351; 18 Pa. 185; 7 R. I. 58; 58 F. 672; 28 Conn. 7 Allen, 395; 22 Pick., 245; 71 Am. D., 689. OPINION BATTLE, J. The subject-matter of this litigation is a fund ......
  • Yost v. Graham
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • November 23, 1901
    ...and his right was not devested by a foreign attachment issued in Pennsylvania subsequent to the assignment." Also in Law v. Mills, 18 Pa. 185 (Syl., point 2): "The validity of a voluntary assignment of personal estate in trust for creditors is to be determined by the law of the place of its......
  • Borton v. Brines-Chase Co.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • April 27, 1896
    ...of Pennsylvania governs this assignment, which was executed and delivered here, at least to the extent of the property situate here: Law v. Mills, 18 Pa. 185; v. Aughinbaugh, 1 P. & W. 124; Lowry v. Hall, 2 W. & S. 132; Burrill on Assignments, 357. Before STERRETT, C.J., GREEN, McCOLLUM, DE......
  • Catlin v. The Wilcox Silver-Plate Company
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • April 29, 1890
    ... ... v. Potter, 11 Gray, 37 (71 Am. Dec. 689); ... Weider v. Maddox, 66 Tex. 372 (59 Am. Rep ... 617, 1 S.W. 168) Warner v. Jaffray, 96 N.Y ... 248; Green v. Van Buskirk, 74 U.S. 139, 7 ... Wall. 139, 19 L.Ed. 109; Askew v. La Cygne ... Bank, 83 Mo. 366 (53 Am. Rep. 590); Law v ... Mills, 18 Pa. 185; Burrill Assignments, 301; Story ... Conflict of Laws, 383, 390 ...          "The ... voluntary transfer of a chattel by the debtor, if it be [123 ... Ind. 482] not forbidden in other respects by the law at the ... place of the situs, is to be as much regarded there, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT