Lawhon v. St. Joseph Veterinary Laboratories
Decision Date | 22 May 1923 |
Docket Number | No. 22704.,22704. |
Citation | 252 S.W. 44 |
Parties | LAWHON v. ST. JOSEPH VETERINARY LABORATORIES et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Buchanan County; Thomas B. Allen, Judge.
Action by Lida J. Lawhon against the St. Joseph Veterinary Laboratories and others. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Reversed and remanded.
Eastin & McNeely, of St. Joseph, for appellant.
Randolph & Randolph, of St. Joseph, for respondent.
Plaintiff's husband, John D. Lawhon, while digging a ditch for a sewer on defendant's premises, was killed by the falling in of the earth from the sides of the ditch. She sues for damages accruing to her by reason of his death.
Defendant, St. Joseph Veterinary Laboratories, hereinafter called the defendant, is a corporation, and at the times of the occurrences presently to be described was engaged in the manufacture of hog cholera serum at St. Joseph, Mo., where it owned and operated a plant for that purpose. In connection with the plant there was a sewer which drained the laboratory and hogpens into a nearby creek. In July, 1920, the management decided to discontinue the use of that sewer and construct another connecting with one of the city's main sewers. The city sewer with which the connection was to be made ran east and west at or near the north line of one of defendant's buildings. Some 4 or 5 feet east of the northeast corner of the building there was a telephone pole, and the connection was to be made at a point immediately east of the pole. From that point the new sewer was to extend in a southwesterly direction a distance of 140 feet, passing along the east side of the building, and getting closer to it as it proceeded south. The incline on which the sewer pipe was to be laid was such that the south end was within 2 or 3 feet of the surface of the ground, while the north end was 13 feet below.
On July 26, 1920, Lawhon and one Hosford began the construction of" the sewer. They commenced at the north end to dig the trench to receive the 18-inch tiles that would form the sewer pipe. As fast as they brought a sufficient length of trench to the necessary depth they laid a tile and then went forward with the excavation, throwing the dirt back over the tile that had been laid. The tiles were 3 feet in length. On the second day, about noon, the construction had progressed to a point near the southeast corner of the building heretofore mentioned. At that time Lawhon was digging at the bottom of the trench, which was about 12 feet deep, and Hosford was just north of him, standing on the end of a tile, and throwing the dirt back. While they were so engaged large segments of earth broke loose and fell in from the west wall of the excavation near the building, completely covering Lawhon, and causing his death.
So far the facts are not in dispute. The terms of the contracts under which Lawhon was employed is the matter sharply at issue; if they were as plaintiff contends, the relation of master and servant was created; if as defendant contends, Lawhon was an independent contractor. The only evidence offered by plaintiff with respect to this phase of the case was the testimony of Hosford. He testified that for a number of years he had worked with Lawhon, but not for hint, and that his employment on defendant's premises in connection with the sewer was brought about by Lawhon merely telling him that a sewer was to be dug there. After stating that he and Lawhon went to defendant's grounds to dig a sewer for it, he testified as follows with reference to the superintendence of the work:
I never saw that.
On the part of the defendant the evidence tended to show:
Dr. Frederick W. Holkenbrink was the vice...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bernblum v. Travelers Ins. Co., 34440.
...supra, in the decisions, above cited, except for the fact that the court en banc in Lawhon v. St. Joseph Veterinary Laboratories (Mo.), 252 S.W. 44, ignored it, and followed the case overruled by it. In that case, a wrongful death action, this court said: "Dr. Frederick W. Holkenbrink (vice......
-
Rutherford v. Tobin Quarries
...... latter. [ Lawhon v. St. Joseph Veterinary Laboratories. (court en banc), 252 S.W. 44.] ......
-
Maltz v. Jackoway-Katz Cap Co.
...... characterized by right of control vested in the latter. [ Lawhon v. St. Joseph Veterinary Laboratories, 252. S.W. 44.] The legislative ......
-
Schaum v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
... 78 S.W.2d 439 336 Mo. 228 Joseph Schaum v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, a Corporation, ...Railroad, 41 S.W.2d 183; Kelly v. Railroad. Co., 79 S.W. 978; Lawhon v. St. Joseph Veterinary. Laboratories, 252 S.W. 44; Conroy v. Vulcan ......