Lawhorn v. State Farm Ins. Companies

Decision Date12 April 1990
Docket NumberNo. 89-CA-1495,89-CA-1495
Citation560 So.2d 619
PartiesRichard LAWHORN v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES, Gaspar Migliore, Theresa Migliore, Guerino Williams, et al. 560 So.2d 619
CourtCourt of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US

Stephen L. Huber, Metairie, for defendant/appellee Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

Russ M. Herman, Mark R. Wolfe, R. Brent Cueria, John B. Loweb, Herman, Herman, Katz & Cotlar, New Orleans, for plaintiff/appellant.

Before LOBRANO, WILLIAMS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.

LOBRANO, Judge.

Plaintiff, Richard Lawhorn, appeals the dismissal of his suit against Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liberty Mutual) by the trial court on a motion for summary judgment.

The pertinent facts are as follows:

On May 24, 1984, at approximately 11:00 p.m., Lawhorn, his wife, Julie, and their minor daughter, Kristen, were driving north on the Pontchartrain Expressway. At the same time defendant, Theresa Migliore (Migliore), was driving south on the expressway. Suddenly, Migliore came upon a Crescent City taxicab stalled in her lane of traffic. In an attempt to avoid the stalled cab, Migliore lost control of her vehicle, jumped the median and struck the Lawhorn vehicle. As a result of the collision, the Lawhorns suffered severe bodily injuries. Julie Lawhorn died several hours after the accident. Plaintiff and his daughter remained hospitalized for several weeks.

At the time of the collision, Migliore was driving a pickup truck owned by her husband, Gaspar Migliore and insured by State Farm Casualty Insurance Company. State Farm settled with Lawhorn and is no longer part of this litigation.

In addition to suing the Migliores, State Farm and others, Lawhorn, via a second and third amended petition, filed suit against Liberty Mutual alleging that ... "at all times mentioned herein, [Liberty Mutual], provided automobile liability insurance coverage to defendants, Theresa Migliore and her husband, Gaspar Migliore, under automobile policy number A02-291-035489-004ME issued to Robert J. Hron covering named defendants for the damages occasioned in connection with the use of the motor vehicle by defendant, Gaspar Migliore, or his wife and his permittee, defendant, Theresa Migliore, and thus, is liable for the damages caused by Gaspar Migliore and/or his permittee, Theresa Migliore, through operation of the Migliore vehicle."

Robert J. Hron is Theresa Migliore's father. The thrust of Lawhorn's supplemental allegation is that Liberty Mutual's policy, although issued to Hron, insured a 1980 Ford Thunderbird which is owned by Theresa Migliore. Thus, Lawhorn asserts, Theresa is a "named insured" under Liberty Mutual's policy and the "temporary substitute provisions" cover the pick-up she was driving.

Liberty Mutual filed a motion for summary judgment asserting they did not provide any liability coverage for Theresa Migliore at the time of the accident, and hence there is no genuine issue of material fact or law. In support of their motion, Liberty Mutual introduced the automobile liability policy which insured Robert J. Hron and the 1980 Ford Thunderbird which Lawhorn asserts was owned by Migliore. In addition to the policy, Liberty Mutual introduced an affidavit by Wanda Harn, their supervisor, which stated that the records of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company indicate that on the day of the accident they had issued no policies of insurance insuring Theresa Migliore and/or Gaspar Migliore. She further stated that the policy of insurance issued to Robert J. Hron does not include Theresa Migliore and/or her husband, Gaspar Migliore, as named insureds nor was the pick-up driven by Migliore at the time of the accident an insured vehicle under that policy.

Lawhorn countered by introducing the depositions of Gaspar and Theresa Migliore in which they testified that, even though registered in Hron's name, the 1980 Thunderbird insured by Liberty Mutual was, in fact, owned by Theresa Migliore; that Theresa Migliore helped pay for the Thunderbird; that the Thunderbird was kept in the possession of Theresa Migliore at her home; that Robert J. Hron insured the Thunderbird on behalf of Theresa Migliore for her use and that the only reason she was not driving the Thunderbird at the time of the accident was because it was in disrepair due to a transmission problem. Lawhorn concludes that because the Thunderbird was actually Theresa Migliore's vehicle, the pickup truck driven by her on the night of the accident falls within the temporary substitute vehicle provisions of Liberty Mutual's policy and therefore is a covered vehicle. 1

In rebuttal, Liberty Mutual asserts there can be no coverage because the pickup truck is not a covered temporary substitute vehicle for two reasons. First, Theresa Migliore is not the owner of the Thunderbird, nor is she a named insured and therefore Liberty Mutual's policy is not applicable. Second, assuming the policy is applicable, the pick-up driven by Migliore was also owned by her and the temporary substitute clause only covers non-owned substitute vehicles.

Lawhorn counters Liberty Mutual's second argument by asserting that the restriction in their temporary substitute vehicle clause violates Louisiana's public policy mandating omnibus coverage.

Without assigning written reasons for judgment, the trial court granted Liberty Mutual's motion for summary judgment. This appeal followed.

For the following reasons, we reverse and remand for a trial on the merits.

A motion for summary judgment is proper only if...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Hope v. S & J Diving, Inc., 2008-CA-0282.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • September 24, 2008
    ...Sea argues that under either Texas or Louisiana law, the judgment of the trial court must be reversed.1 In Lawhorn v. State Farm Ins. Co., 560 So.2d 619, 621 (La.App. 4 Cir.1990), we held that the "fact that [an] insurance policy is issued to one person is not dispositive of whether another......
  • Samuels v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • December 6, 2005
    ...mistaken or fraudulent conduct of the agent who issued the policy will be detrimental to the policyholder, see Lawhorn v. State Farm Ins. Co., 560 So.2d 619 (La.App. 4 Cir.1990); Washington v. Montgomery Ward, 25,921 (La.App. 2 Cir.6/22/94), 640 So.2d 822, research reveals no caselaw wherei......
  • Smith v. Matthews
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • January 19, 1993
    ... ... Compare State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development ... 943, 175 So.2d 277 (1965); Lawhorn v. State Farm Insurance ... Cos., 560 So.2d 619 (La. 4th ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT