Lay. v. Phillips., (No. 8030)

Citation116 W.Va. 60
Decision Date12 February 1935
Docket Number(No. 8030)
CourtSupreme Court of West Virginia
PartiesR. M. Lay et al. v. Robert Phillips et al.
1. Equity

When a court of equity takes jurisdiction of a cause for one purpose, it will ordinarily dispose of the questions involved to avoid a multiplicity of suits.

2. Appeal and Error

An appellate court cannot consider the evidence upon which the report of a commissioner in chancery, not excepted to, is predicated.

3. Costs

The allowance and apportionment of costs are ordinarily in the discretion of the trial chancellor.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Fayette County.

Suit by R. M. Lay and another against Robert Phillips, Nancy Phillips, and others. From a decree for plaintiffs, named defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

Carl C. Sanders and Clarence W. Meadows, for appellants.

Dillon, Mahan & White, for appellees.

Litz, President:

Mary King died June 20, 1930, seized and possessed of onehalf undivided interest in and to lots 14, 15, 21, 22, 23 and 24 in section 4 of Sherwood Heights Addition to the town of Mount Hope, Fayette County, West Virginia; the remaining interest being owned by her husband, Morris King. She willed him her estate. October 20, 1930, Morris King, in con sideration of $5.00, paid, conveyed to Nancy Phillips numbers 21, 22, 23 and 24 of said lots, and four days later he conveyed to her lots 14 and 15, in consideration of $5.00, and the assumption by her of a mortgage debt against the two lots in favor of Mount Hope Building & Loan Association. By deed dated December 9, 1930, Nancy Phillips and Robert Phillips, her husband, in consideration of $100.00 and "other valuable considerations", conveyed the six lots to R. M. Lay, with covenants of general warranty of title. By deed of like date, R. M. Lay and Myrtle Lay, his wife, conveyed the property to G. C. Trail, trustee, in trust to secure the payment of a negotiable promissory note, evidencing the deferred purchase price, executed by the Lays and payable to the Phillipses, at the Bank of Raleigh, Beckley, West Virginia, four months from date, in the sum of $5,900.00; the deed further providing that the note shall be paid in monthly installments of $100.00 each, and that in default of any payment, the residue shall become due and payable. The trustee, having advertised the property for sale upon default of the makers to pay the note, in accordance with the terms of the trust deed, this suit was instituted January 6, 1932, by R. M. Lay and Myrtle Lay against Nancy Phillips, Robert Phillips, G. C. Trail., trustee, Morris King and the creditors of Mary King, deceased, to enjoin the sale, ascertain the liabilities against the property, and for general relief. Upon the filing of the answer of defendants, Nancy and Robert Phillips, the cause was referred to a commissioner to ascertain and report, inter alia, the liabilities and respective priorities, against the property.

The commissioner reported that Nancy Phillips is the equitable owner of the property under a contract between her and the Lays by which they agreed to reconvey to her. He further reported as liens against the interest formerly owned by Mary King, in addition to claims admittedly assumed by Nancy Phillips, debts of Mary King, as follows: $302.31 in favor of Sandstone Lumber Company and $63.71 in favor of W. P. Broyles. An order was entered April 28, 1934, confirming the report and directing sale of the property to satisfy the liens and costs.

Appellants, Nancy and Robert Phillips, contend: (1) that the ascertainment and satisfaction of claims against the estate of Mary King are not within the legitimate purposes of the suit; (2) that the property in controversy is protected against the debts of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Tate v. United Fuel Gas Co., 790
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of West Virginia
    • July 15, 1952
    ......137 W.Va. 272. TATE,. v. UNITED FUEL GAS CO. et al. C. C. No. 790. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted April 22, 1952. ... involved to avoid a multiplicity of suits.' Point 1, Syllabus, Lay v. Phillips, 116 W.Va. 60 [178 S.E. 523.]' Pt. 3, Syl., Webber v. Offhaus, ......
  • Webber v. Offhaus
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of West Virginia
    • December 12, 1950
    ...cause for one purpose, it will ordinarily dispose of the questions involved to avoid a multiplicity of suits.' Point 1, Syllabus, Lay v. Phillips, 116 W.Va. 60 4. When a court of equity has rightfully acquired jurisdiction of a cause in which the facts existing at the time it is instituted ......
  • Burdette v. Campbell
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of West Virginia
    • March 7, 1944
    ...lies in the discretion of the trial chancellor, and such allowance will not be disturbed unless the discretion is abused. Lay v. Phillips, 116 W.Va. 60, 178 S.E. 523; York v. Meek, 96 W.Va. 427, 123 S.E. 225; Hannah v. Wilson Lumber Co., 92 W.Va. 104, 114 S.E. 506; Code, 59-2-11. At law cos......
  • Burdette v. Campbell
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of West Virginia
    • March 7, 1944
    ...lies in the discretion of the trial chancellor, and such allowance will not be disturbed unless the discretion is abused. Lay v. Phillips, 116 W.Va. 60, 178 S.E. 523; York v. Meek, 96 W.Va. 427, 123 S.E. 225; v. Wilson Lumber Co., 92 W.Va. 104, 114 S.E. 506; Code, 59-2-11. At law costs are ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT