Lay v. Richmond & D. R. Co
| Decision Date | 21 April 1890 |
| Citation | Lay v. Richmond & D. R. Co, 11 S.E. 412, 106 N.C. 404 (N.C. 1890) |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | Lay. v. Richmond & D. R. Co. |
Railroad Companies—Private Crossings—Trespassers.
1.In crossing a railroad track on horseback, on a private way, plaintiff's horse caught its shoe between the rail and a spike, and was thrown down, and, its foot still remaining caught, was injured by a dump-car which came along soon after, and which plaintiff had signaled in time to stop before running over the horse.The safety of the place as a crossing was in dispute.Held, that it was error to withdraw the question of contributory negligence from the jury.
2.That plaintiff was a trespasser in attempting to cross a railroad track at a place other than a public crossing will not excuse the company from an injury which, by ordinary care, it could have avoided.
Civil action, tried at spring term, 1890, of the superior court of Gaston county, before Philips, J.The plaintiff demanded $200 for injuries to a horse, which he alleged was injured by the negligence of the defendant, and which was denied by the defendant, as set out in the pleadings, all of which, with the issues submitted to the jury, appear in the record.
Plaintiff offered himself as a witness, and swore: Here plaintiff rested.
The defendant offered in evidence (1) the date of the summons in this cause, dated 4th August, 1888; (2) thecomplaint, showing the accident in November, 1887.James Baber: It was five rails from the crossing, and the rails are thirty feet long.The first man I saw was about that crossing, and he was hallooing, 'Stop!'This was Rufus Lay.I had been hallooed at to stop so much by people who wanted to get a ride that I paid no attention.Tt was down grade from the bridge to the horse.We were running twelve or fourteen miles an hour.Next I saw W. S. Lay, who was hallooing also, and we then put on the brakes.We thought something was the matter when we saw the second man.I was then employed on the road. 1 am not now.I have been off about eighteen months.Cross-Examined.My brother, Jack Baber,...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Swift v. Southern Railway Company
...across the track at an established crossing. Harrison v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 168 N. C. 382, 84 S.E. 519; Lay v. Richmond & D. R. Co., 106 N.C. 404, 11 S.E. 412. ...
-
Gunn v. Ohio River U'd Co.
...84 Va, 63 (45 S. E. Rep. 24); 5 S. E. Rep. 577, 578; 58 Ala. 672; 36 Md. 366; Id. 542; 50 Mo. 461; 38111.483; 34 N. Y. 622; 60 Mo. 475; 106 N. C. 404 (11 S. E. Rep. 412); 3 Wood R'y Law § 417 (n. 13); 10 S. E. Rep. 988; 12 S. E. Rep. 77, 78; 10 Ired. 402; 25 Mich. 279; 5 Sneed 524; 52 Tex. ......
-
Price v. Gabel
... ... the proximate cause of the injury, while that of the ... plaintiff is only a remote cause, or a mere condition of it, ... the action will lie.' Beach, Contrib. Neg. (2d Ed.) § 54; ... Gothard v. Alabama, etc., R. R. Co., 67 Ala. 114; ... Lay v. Richmond, etc., R. R. Co., 106 N.C. 404, 11 ... S.E. 412; Newcomb v. Boston Protective Department, ... 146 Mass. 596, 16 N.E. 555, 4 Am. St. Rep. 354; Norris v ... Litchfield, 35 N.H. 271 [69 Am. Dec. 546]; Davies v ... Mann, 10 Mees. & W. 546.' This view of the law was ... ...
-
Nathan v. Charlotte St. Ry. Co
...of cases. Pickett v. Railroad Co., 117 N. C. 638, 23 S. E. 264; McAdoo v. Railroad Co., 105 N. C. 140, 11 S. E. 316; Lay v. Railroad Co., 106 N. C. 410, 11 S. E. 412; Denmark v. Railroad Co., 107 N. C. 185, 12 S. E. 54; Scott v. Railroad Co., 96 N. C. 428, 2 S. E. 151. There was no error, t......