Lay v. Shores

CourtMississippi Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtCOOK, P. J.
CitationLay v. Shores, 112 Miss. 140, 72 So. 881 (Miss. 1916)
Decision Date13 November 1916
Docket Number19429
PartiesLAY v. SHORES, PRESIDENT OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, ET AL

APPEAL from the chancery court of Tallahatchie county, HON. JOE A. MAY, Chancellor.

Suit by J. H. Lay against J. A. Shores president of board of supervisors and others. From a decree for respondents complainant appeals.

Appellant instituted a suit in chancery to enjoin the appellees from acting in their official capacity in issuing, executing, and delivering bonds of a road district of Tallahatchie county composed of supervisors' districts Nos. 4 and 5 of said county. From a decree sustaining a demurrer to the bill, this appeal is prosecuted.

Reversed and remanded.

Gary &amp Rice, for appellant.

A. E. Weinstain, W. R. Woods and J. M. Kuykendall, for appellees.

OPINION

COOK, P. J.

It is our opinion that all of the assignments of error save one are totally without merit. The record shows, that the notice given by the board of supervisors of their intention to issue the bonds in question did not measure up to the requirements of the statute. The notice required in this case is prescribed by section 2 of chapter 149, Laws of 1910. The notice in this case was published in three issues of the Tallahatchie Herald, a weekly newspaper of the county. The first publication was on May 4, 1916, the second, on May 11th, and the third, on May 18th. The notice was to the effect that the board of supervisors proposed to issue bonds to the amount of two hundred thousand dollars at its regular meeting on June 5th, if twenty per centum of the qualified electors did not, in the meantime, petition against the issuance...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Gully v. Wilmut Gas & Oil Co
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • February 10, 1936
    ...the inferior tribunal to give that tribunal jurisdiction. 15 C. J. 842; Bolivar County v. Coleman, 15 So. 107, 71 Miss. 767; Lay v. Shores, 72 So. 881, 112 Miss. 140; Green v. Board of Supervisors, 161 So. Currie-Finch Brick & Lbr. Co. v. Miller, 86 So. 579, 123 Miss. 850; Leaf Hotel Corp. ......
  • Merchants' Bank & Trust Co. Scott County
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • February 13, 1933
    ...to the act are to be construed so as to require conformity to statutory directions. State v. Wall, 98 Miss. 521, 54 So. 5; Lay v. Shores, 112 Miss. 140, 72 So. 881; v. Vice, 71 Miss. 912, 15 So. 129; Board of Sup'rs of Jefferson County v. Arrighi, 54 Miss. 668. By the terms of section 369, ......
  • Maris v. Lindsey
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • January 1, 1920
    ...than one week elapsed between the last publication and the meeting of the board, the publication conformed to the law. The case of Lay v. Shores, 112 Miss. 140, is direct conflict with the Weston case on this point but it is not referred to. If this court in effect, overruled the Weston cas......
  • Maris v. Lindsey
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • February 14, 1921
    ...than one week elapsed between the last publication and the meeting of the board, the publication conformed to the law. The case of Lay v. Shores, 112 Miss. 140, is in direct with the Weston case on this point but it is not referred to. If this court in effect, overruled the Weston case, why......
  • Get Started for Free