League of Women Voters of Pa. v. Degraffenreid
Citation | 265 A.3d 207 |
Decision Date | 21 December 2021 |
Docket Number | No. 4 MAP 2021,4 MAP 2021 |
Parties | LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA and Lorraine Haw v. Veronica DEGRAFFENREID as Acting Secretary of the Commonwealth Appeal of: Shameekah Moore, Martin Vickless, Kristin June Irwin and Kelly Williams |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania |
Gopalakrishnan Balachandran, Esq., Lisa Ann Mathewson, Esq., The Law Offices of Lisa A. Mathewson, LLC, for Amicus Curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Rodney A. Corey, Esq., Harrisburg, PA, James Guthrie Mann, Esq., PA House of Representatives, Jill S. Vecchio, Esq., for Amicus Curiae Republican Caucus of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives
Suzanne V. Estrella, Esq., Pennslyvania Coalition Against Rape, Tallahassee, FL, for Amicus Curiae Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape
Peter David Goldberger, Esq., Law Office of Peter Goldberger, for Amicus Curiae Pennsylvania Assn of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Howard Greeley Hopkirk, Esq., Joshua D. Shapiro, Esq., Harrisburg, PA, for Amicus Curiae Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General
Kenneth Lawson Joel, Esq., Harrisburg, PA, for Amicus Curiae Tom Wolf
Peter E. Kratsa, Esq., West Chester, PA, for Amici Curiae Pennsylvania Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Pennsylvania Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Pennsylvania Assn of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Pennsylvania Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Kevin Francis McCarthy, Esq., for Amicus Curiae Pennsylvania District Attorney's Association
Melissa Bevan Melewsky, Esq., Harrisburg, PA, for Amicus Curiae Pennsylvania NewsMedia Association
Angela Rowan Monaco, Esq., Eli Mordecai Segal, Esq., Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, for Amicus Curiae Juvenile Law Center
John Francis Stoviak, Esq., for Amicus Curiae Pennsylvanians for Modern Courts
Abby Nicole Trovinger, Esq., Department of Corrections, for Amicus Curiae Office of Victim Advocate
William R. Christman III, Esq., West Chester, PA, Scot Russel Withers, Esq., Lamb McErlane P.C., David Pittinsky, Esq., Ballard Spahr LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellants Shameekah Moore, Martin Vickless, Kristin June Irwin and Kelly Williams
Steven Edward Bizar, Esq., Craig Joseph Castiglia, Esq., Michael Corcoran, Esq., Philadelphia, PA, Tiffany Ellen Engsell, Esq., Michael Hugh McGinley, Esq., Dechert LLP, Andrew Chapman Christy, Esq., American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania and Lorraine Haw
Michael E. Gehring, Esq., Philadelphia, PA, Stephen G. Harvey, Esq., Steve Harvey Law LLC, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellee Greenblatt, Ronald L.
Kathleen Marie Kotula, Esq., Pennsylvania Department of State, Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs, for Veronica Degraffenreid
OPINION
In this direct appeal, we review the Commonwealth Court's entry of a permanent injunction blocking the Secretary of the Commonwealth from certifying the results of the November 5, 2019 election in which the voters of the Commonwealth were asked to approve a proposed "victim's rights amendment," described as "Marsy's Law," which would be added as a new provision of Article I of the Pennsylvania Constitution – Section 9.1 ("Victim's Rights Amendment"). The Commonwealth Court entered its injunction on the basis that the Victim's Rights Amendment violated the requirement of Article XI, Section 1 of the Pennsylvania Constitution that, "[w]hen two or more amendments shall be submitted they shall be voted upon separately." Pa. Const. art. XI, § 1. After careful review, we affirm the decision of the Commonwealth Court, because, for the reasons we detail herein, the Victim's Rights Amendment was, in actuality, a collection of amendments which added a multiplicity of new rights to our Constitution, and, because those new rights were not interrelated in purpose and function, the manner in which it was presented to the voters denied them their right to consider and vote on each change separately, as Article XI, § 1 mandates. We, therefore, affirm the decision of the Commonwealth Court.
We emphasize at the outset that our decision does not address the wisdom of the multifarious provisions of the Victim's Rights Amendment, or the policy choices giving rise to them; rather, our obligation in this matter is solely to resolve the question of whether the amendment, as presented to the voters of this Commonwealth in the November 5, 2019 general election, complied with the inviolable "separate vote" requirement of Article XI, § 1 that "[w]hen two or more amendments shall be submitted they shall be voted upon separately." Pa. Const. art. XI, § 1.
In June 2019, after having been previously approved in the 2018 legislative session, Senate Bill 1011 of 2018 was adopted by both houses of the General Assembly as Joint Resolution 1 of 2019 (hereinafter "Joint Resolution 2019-1."). It amends Article I of the Pennsylvania Constitution by adding the following wholly new provision:
Joint Resolution 2019-1.1
The then-Secretary of the Commonwealth, Kathy Boockvar,2 drafted the text of the question for this proposed amendment as it appeared on the ballot in the November 5, 2019 election ("Ballot Question"), and twice published it in newspapers in each county. The Ballot Question read in full:
Shall the Pennsylvania Constitution be amended to grant certain rights to crime victims, including to be treated with fairness, respect and dignity; considering their safety in bail proceedings; timely notice and opportunity to take part in public proceedings; reasonable protection from the accused; right to refuse discovery requests made by the accused; restitution and return of property; proceedings free from delay; and to be informed of these rights, so they can enforce them?
Ballot Question (Plaintiff's Exhibit 1 offered in Oct. 23, 2019 hearing in League of Women Voters v. Boockvar , 578 M.D. 2019 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2019)).
On October 10, 2019, Appellees3 (collectively referred to as "the League") filed a declaratory judgment action in the Commonwealth Court and sought to preliminarily enjoin the tabulation and certification of the votes on the Victim's Rights Amendment, alleging that it violated Article XI, § 1.4 The matter was assigned to Judge Ellen Ceisler, who conducted an evidentiary hearing and heard argument on the motion. On October 30, 2019, Judge Ceisler issued an order granting the requested preliminary injunction and enjoining the Secretary "from tabulating and certifying the votes in the November 2019 General Election relating to the ballot question asking voters whether the Pennsylvania Constitution should be amended to include a new section providing for victims’ rights until final disposition of the Petition for Review, including appeals." League of Women Voters v. Boockvar , 578 M.D. 2019 (Pa. Cmwlth. filed Oct. 30, 2019) (order).
Thereafter, Appellants5 filed an emergency motion with our Court seeking to overturn Judge Ceisler's order. After expedited review, we affirmed the preliminary injunction. League of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wolf v. Gen. Assembly of the Commonwealth
...Our Supreme Court affirmed, agreeing with this Court that the ballot question violated article XI, section 1. Id. at 1270. Similarly, in DeGraffenreid, also prior to the election, the Secretary published a ballot question regarding a proposed constitutional amendment. DeGraffenreid, 265 A.3......