Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit, No. 91-1657
Court | United States Supreme Court |
Writing for the Court | REHNQUIST |
Citation | 113 S.Ct. 1160,122 L.Ed.2d 517,507 U.S. 163 |
Docket Number | No. 91-1657 |
Decision Date | 03 March 1993 |
Parties | Charlene LEATHERMAN, et al., Petitioners v. TARRANT COUNTY NARCOTICS INTELLIGENCE AND COORDINATION UNIT et al |
v.
TARRANT COUNTY NARCOTICS INTELLIGENCE AND COORDINATION UNIT et al.
Petitioner homeowners filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against respondents—local officials acting in their official capacity, a county, and two municipal corporations—alleging that the conduct of local police officers in searching their homes for narcotics violated the Fourth Amendment, and asserting that the basis for municipal liability was the failure adequately to train the police officers involved. The Federal District Court dismissed the complaints because they failed to meet the "heightened pleading standard" adopted by the Court of Appeals, which requires that complaints against municipal corporations in § 1983 cases state with factual detail and particularity the basis for the claim. The Court of Appeals affirmed.
Held: A federal court may not apply a "heightened pleading standard"—more stringent than the usual pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)—in civil rights cases alleging municipal liability under § 1983. First, the heightened standard cannot be justified on the ground that a more relaxed pleading standard would eviscerate municipalities' immunity from suit by subjecting them to expensive and time-consuming discovery in every § 1983 case. Municipalities, although free from respondeat superior liability under § 1983, see Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611, do not enjoy absolute or qualified immunity from § 1983 suits, id., at 701, 98 S.Ct., at 2041; Owen v. City of Independence, 445 U.S. 622, 650, 100 S.Ct. 1398, 1415, 63 L.Ed.2d 673. Second, it is not possible to square the heightened standard applied in this case with the liberal system of "notice pleading" set up by the Federal Rules. Rule 8(a)(2) requires that a complaint include only "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." And while Rule 9(b) requires greater particularity in pleading certain actions, it does not include among the enumerated actions any reference to complaints alleging municipal liability under § 1983. Pp. ____.
954 F.2d 1054 (CA5 1992), reversed and remanded.
REHNQUIST, C.J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Richard Gladden, Denton, TX, for petitioners.
Brett A. Ringle, Dallas, TX, for respondents.
Chief Justice REHNQUIST delivered the opinion of the Court.
We granted certiorari to decide whether a federal court may apply a "heightened pleading standard"—more stringent than the usual pleading requirements of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure—in civil rights cases alleging municipal liability under Rev.Stat. § 1979, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We hold it may not.
We review here a decision granting a motion to dismiss, and therefore must accept as true all the factual allegations in the complaint. See United States v. Gaubert, 499 U.S. ----, ----, 111 S.Ct. 1267, ----, 113 L.Ed.2d 335 (1991). This action arose out of two separate incidents involving the execution of search warrants by local law enforcement officers. Each involved the forcible entry into a home based on the detection of odors associated with the manufacture of narcotics. One homeowner claimed that he was assaulted by the officers after they had entered; another claimed that the police had entered her home in her absence and killed her two dogs. Plaintiffs sued several local officials in their official capacity and the county and two municipal corporations that employed the police officers involved in the incidents, asserting that the police conduct had violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The stated basis for municipal liability under Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978), was the failure of these bodies adequately to train the police officers involved. See Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 109 S.Ct. 1197, 103 L.Ed.2d 412 (1989).
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas ordered the complaints dismissed, because they failed to meet the "heightened pleading standard" required by the decisional law of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. 755 F.Supp. 726 (1991). The Fifth Circuit, in turn, affirmed the judgment of dismissal, 954 F.2d 1054 (1992), and we granted certiorari, 505 U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 2989, 120 L.Ed.2d 867 (1992), to resolve a conflict among the Courts of Appeals concerning...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Estate of Bryant v. Balt. Police Dep't, Civil Action No. ELH-19-384
...550 U.S. at 555). That standard applies to § 1983 claims. See Leatherman v. Tarrant Cty. Narcotics Intelligence & Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163, 168 (1993) (rejecting heightened pleading standards for § 1983 claims). This standard, the Supreme Court has explained, is "a context-s......
-
C.S.B. Commodities, Inc. v. Urban Trend (Hk) Ltd., Case No. 08 cv 1548.
...under § 1983. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius." Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163, 168, 113 S.Ct. 1160, 122 L.Ed.2d 517 (1993). Although unfair competition claims are not one of the enumerated 9(b) actions, the Lanham Act prot......
-
Shi Liang Lin v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, Docket No. 02-4611-ag.
...534 U.S. 19, 28, 122 S.Ct. 441, 151 L.Ed.2d 339 (2001); Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163, 168, 113 S.Ct. 1160, 122 L.Ed.2d 517 The language of § 601(a) does nothing to alter the pre-IIRIRA definition of "political opinion" in ......
-
City of Dover v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency, Civil Action No. 12–1994(JDB).
...U.S. 232, 236, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974); see also Leatherman v. Tarrant Cnty. Narcotics Intelligence & Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163, 164, 113 S.Ct. 1160, 122 L.Ed.2d 517 (1993). Therefore, the factual allegations must be presumed true, and plaintiffs must be given every fa......
-
C.S.B. Commodities, Inc. v. Urban Trend (Hk) Ltd., Case No. 08 cv 1548.
...liability under § 1983. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius." Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163, 168, 113 S.Ct. 1160, 122 L.Ed.2d 517 (1993). Although unfair competition claims are not one of the enumerated 9(b) actions, the Lanham Act......
-
City of Dover v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency, Civil Action No. 12–1994(JDB).
...416 U.S. 232, 236, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974); see also Leatherman v. Tarrant Cnty. Narcotics Intelligence & Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163, 164, 113 S.Ct. 1160, 122 L.Ed.2d 517 (1993). Therefore, the factual allegations must be presumed true, and plaintiffs must be given every fa......
-
Ashiegbu v. Purviance, No. C-2-98-28.
...subject to the liberal federal rules of "notice pleading." See Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163, 168, 113 S.Ct. 1160, 122 L.Ed.2d 517 (1993). To establish liability under § 1983 against state (or municipal) officials acting in their ind......
-
Hadad v. Croucher, No. 1:87 CV 1211.
...The Village itself, of course, cannot utilize this defense. Leatherman v. Tarrant Cty. Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163, 164-66, 113 S.Ct. 1160, 1161-62, 122 L.Ed.2d 517, 523 (1993); Owen v. City of Independence, Page 1242 U.S. 622, 650, 100 S.Ct. 1398, 1415, 63 L.......
-
Reflections on "Moving Toward Integration" and Modern Exclusionary-Zoning Cases Under the Fair Housing Act.
...Federal Rules, and not by judicial interpretation.'") (quoting Leatherman v. Tarrant Cty. Narcotics Intelligence & Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163, 168 (1993)). The federal rules may be amended only pursuant to the Rules Enabling Act. See 28 U.S.C. [section][section] 2071-74 (117.) Cf. ......
-
DETERMINATION OF THE U.S. PLEADING FROM THE CIVIL LAW PERSPECTIVE.
...note 39, at 992. (49) See Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 (1957); Leatherman v. Tarrant Cnty. Narcotics Intel. & Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163 (1993); Swierkiewicz, supra note 44, at (50) See Miller, From Conley, supra note 1, at 12; Fairman, supra note 45, at 996. (51) See Swierkiewicz......
-
THE COLLAPSE OF THE FEDERAL RULES SYSTEM.
...toward "noncontroversial, largely meaningless efforts"). (105) E.g., Leatherman v. Tarrant Cnty. Narcotics Intel. & Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163, 168 (1993) (rejecting the lower court's effort to craft a heightened pleading requirement for civil rights litigation against local govern......
-
THE INTRACTABILITY OF QUALIFIED IMMUNITY.
...the Court initially appeared to reject that possibility, see Leatherman v. Tarrant Cty. Narcotics Intelligence & Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163 (1993), its more recent cases have demonstrated skepticism about the notice pleading standard more (46) As I have previously argued, this is p......