Lee Line Steamers v. Robinson, 2481.
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit) |
| Citation | 218 F. 559 |
| Docket Number | 2481. |
| Parties | LEE LINE STEAMERS v. ROBINSON. |
| Decision Date | 13 November 1914 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 practice notes
-
May Department Stores Co. v. Bell, 9453.
...Railway Co. v. Odegaard, 182 F. 56 (C. C. A. 8); North Jersey St. Ry. Co. v. Purdy, 142 F. 955 (C. C. A. 3); Lee Line Steamers v. Robinson, 218 F. 559, L. R. A. 1916C, 358 (C. C. A. The maxim has been applied in two cases 61 F.2d 836 growing out of accidents on escalators. Petrie v. Kaufman......
-
Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Smith, 5432.
...by this court in Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. v. South Fork Coal Co., 139 F. 528, 1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 533; Lee Line Steamers v. Robinson, 218 F. 559, L. R. A. 1916C, 358; Pennsylvania Co. v. Clark, 266 F. 182, 184. Its application to master and servant cases was discussed in the South Fork ......
-
Powe v. Atl. Coast Line R. Co, 12975.
...defense cannot be used by plaintiff to establish the issues raised by the general denial." In Lee Line Steamers v. Robinson (C. C. A.) 218 F. 559, 562, L. R. A. 1916C, 358, the court, also citing Glenn v. Sumner, said: "It is true that, where the law authorizes a defendant to set up several......
-
Powe v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 12975.
...defense cannot be used by plaintiff to establish the issues raised by the general denial." In Lee Line Steamers v. Robinson (C. C. A.) 218 F. 559, 562, L. R. A. 1916C, 358, the court, also citing Glenn v. Sumner, said: "It is true that, where the law authorizes a defendant to set up several......
Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
-
May Department Stores Co. v. Bell, 9453.
...Railway Co. v. Odegaard, 182 F. 56 (C. C. A. 8); North Jersey St. Ry. Co. v. Purdy, 142 F. 955 (C. C. A. 3); Lee Line Steamers v. Robinson, 218 F. 559, L. R. A. 1916C, 358 (C. C. A. The maxim has been applied in two cases 61 F.2d 836 growing out of accidents on escalators. Petrie v. Kaufman......
-
Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Smith, 5432.
...by this court in Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. v. South Fork Coal Co., 139 F. 528, 1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 533; Lee Line Steamers v. Robinson, 218 F. 559, L. R. A. 1916C, 358; Pennsylvania Co. v. Clark, 266 F. 182, 184. Its application to master and servant cases was discussed in the South Fork ......
-
Powe v. Atl. Coast Line R. Co, 12975.
...defense cannot be used by plaintiff to establish the issues raised by the general denial." In Lee Line Steamers v. Robinson (C. C. A.) 218 F. 559, 562, L. R. A. 1916C, 358, the court, also citing Glenn v. Sumner, said: "It is true that, where the law authorizes a defendant to set up several......
-
Powe v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 12975.
...defense cannot be used by plaintiff to establish the issues raised by the general denial." In Lee Line Steamers v. Robinson (C. C. A.) 218 F. 559, 562, L. R. A. 1916C, 358, the court, also citing Glenn v. Sumner, said: "It is true that, where the law authorizes a defendant to set up several......
Request a trial to view additional results