Lee v. City of Ames
Decision Date | 12 May 1925 |
Docket Number | 36469 |
Citation | 203 N.W. 790,199 Iowa 1342 |
Parties | EMMA M. LEE et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF AMES, Appellee. IN RE APPEAL OF EMMA M. LEE (and three other cases) |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Appeal from Story District Court.--E. M. MCCALL, Judge.
IDENTICAL objections made by four different property owners to certain paving assessments were overruled by the city council of Ames. Upon appeal to the district court, the assessments were affirmed. This appeal is from the decree of the district court. The cases were consolidated for the purpose of trial in the district court, and are presented in like manner on this appeal.
Affirmed.
Lee & Garfield and R. L. Bryant, for appellants.
J. Y Luke, for appellee.
The paving project involved started in the fall of 1915, when a resolution of necessity for paving some principal streets of the city of Ames was adopted by the city council. On September 20, 1915, construction was ordered. In December plans and specifications were approved. Clauses of the specifications having some bearing on matters in controversy are:
The advertisement for bids, published early in January, 1916, contained the following clauses:
On January 16, 1916, at a meeting of the council, the bids were opened and read. The bids contained proposals on three separate items: namely, for paving, curbing and guttering, and "extra excavation." The advertisement called for bids upon nine different types of paving: namely, vitrified brick, creosoted wood block, six different kinds of asphalt, and bitulithic pavement. There were nine different bidders upon the paving, two upon curb and gutter alone, and eleven bids on extra excavation. All of the pavement bids, except one, contained proposals for brick paving. Most of them also contained proposals for wood block and asphalt paving. There were two bids on bitulithic pavement: one by the Des Moines Asphalt Paving Company, at $ 1.89 1/2 per square yard, and the other by James Horrabin & Company, at $ 1.92 1/2 per square yard. Eleven of the twelve bidders submitted bids on extra excavation, ranging from 34 cents to 50 cents per cubic yard. The bid of the Des Moines Asphalt Paving Company was 50 cents per cubic yard, or a total of $ 6,544. The Des Moines Asphalt Paving Company was the low bidder on bitulithic paving, with a price of $ 1.89 1/2 per square yard. Sam Bowers, who made no bid on the paving or curb and gutter, was the low bidder on the extra excavation, at a price of 34 cents per cubic yard. The council made no decision at this session, and adjourned to meet three days later.
At the meeting of the council on January 19, 1916, at which there were present the mayor, Parley Sheldon, and councilmen Stultz, Rice, Gilchrist, Murray, Corlett, and Spinney, it was moved by Corlett "that the contract be awarded to the Des Moines Asphalt Paving Company for paving with bitulithic pavement." The motion was carried, by unanimous vote of the council. At this meeting of the council, a formal resolution was adopted, by unanimous vote of the council, accepting the bid of the Des Moines Asphalt Paving Company for the improvement of certain streets and avenues by paving with bitulithic pavement, and instructing the mayor to enter into contract, on behalf of the city, with said company for the construction of said improvement.
On January 31, 1916, at a meeting of the council, Mayor Parley Sheldon, in a written communication, returned the resolution awarding the contract for paving to the Des Moines Asphalt Paving Company, without approval, and stated as his reasons therefor, in substance, that the bid accepted was 6 1/2 cents higher per square yard than the bid of the same company for asphaltic paving, and stated that:
"I object to and withhold my assent from the same because I regard the expenditure of the public and private funds largely in excess of the bid of same firm for a pavement more durable and less expensive in maintenance during its economical life."
At a meeting of the council on February 7, 1916, the resolution awarding the contract for paving to the Des Moines Asphalt Paving Company, passed on January 19, 1916, and vetoed by the mayor, was adopted and passed, over the objections of the mayor, by unanimous vote of the council; and the contract was signed by the mayor, on behalf of the city, and by the Des Moines Asphalt Paving Company, and by a formal resolution approved by unanimous vote of the council.
The records of the council do not disclose any proceedings in reference to the contract for the extra excavation; but the contract itself shows that the contract for extra excavation was made with the same company, at the price of 34 cents per cubic yard. This was not in a separate contract, but was included in the contract for the paving improvement.
On the trial, appellants produced as witnesses the city clerk, A. B. Maxwell, and Parley Sheldon. Maxwell produced and identified copies of the various bids, and testified that the bid of the Des Moines Asphalt Paving Company for extra excavation was 50 cents per cubic yard, and amounted, on the estimate furnished, to $ 6,544; that the bid of Sam Bowers for extra excavation was 34 cents per cubic yard, totaling $ 4,449.92; that the contract for paving entered into with the Des Moines Asphalt Paving Company contained also a contract for extra excavation at 34 cents per cubic yard. The witness also testified that his record contained nothing about negotiations with reference to the extra excavation contract, outside of the contract itself.
Parley Sheldon testified that John MacVicar was before the council, representing the Des Moines Asphalt Paving Company, and that:
Witness testified that the council accepted the proposition made by MacVicar. Witness also testified that he was not in favor of bitulithic paving; that he did not veto the resolution simply because the Des Moines Asphalt Paving Company was given the contract for extra grading at the same price as the bid of...
To continue reading
Request your trial