Lee v. Lancaster

Decision Date04 May 1972
Docket NumberNo. 5307,5307
Citation262 So.2d 124
PartiesCalvin LEE v. Charles D. LANCASTER, Jr.
CourtCourt of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US

Gerald J. Martinez, Everhardt & Martinez, Metairie, for plaintiff-appellant.

Ben C. Toledano, Porteous, Toledano, Hainkel & Johnson, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee.

Before REGAN, SAMUEL, CHASEZ, REDMANN, LEMMON, GULOTTA, and BOUTALL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, the democratic candidate for Representative of House District 80, appeals a judgment which dismissed, on exception to the court's jurisdiction, plaintiff's demand that defendant, the Republican candidate who won the the general election, be declared ineligible for failure to meet the residency requirements for legislators stated by Const. art. 3 § 9. 1

But Const. art. 3 § 10 provides:

'Each house shall be the judge of the qualifications, election, and returns of its own members, choose its own officers, except the president of the Senate, determine the rules of its procedure, not inconsistent with the provisions of this Constitution, and may punish its members for disorderly conduct and contempt, and, with the concurrence of two-thirds of all its members elected, may expel a member.'

Where art. 3 § 10 is applicable, as in the case of a general election contest, the courts have no jurisdiction. State Ex rel. O'Donnell v. Houston, 40 La.Ann. 598, 4 So. 482 (1888).

Plaintiff argues eligibility under art. 3 § 9 is not among the 'qualifications' of which the House is the judge under art. 3 § 10. To the contrary, we hold that it is precisely those qualifications (including residency) which are stated by art. 3 § 9 of which § 10 makes the House the judge.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

1 'Every elector under this Constitution shall be eligible to a seat in the House of Representatives, and every elector who has reached the age of twenty-five years shall be eligible to a seat in the Senate; provided, that no person shall be eligible to the Legislature unless at the time of his election he has been a citizen of the State for five years, and an actual resident of the district or parish or ward of the parish of Orleans from which he may be elected for two years immediately preceding his election. The seat of any member who may change his residence from the district or parish or ward of the parish of Orleans which he represents shall thereby be vacated, any declaration of a retention of domicle to the contrary...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • State ex rel. Olson v. Bakken, s. 10362
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • January 14, 1983
    ...of the legislature has final and exclusive authority to judge its members. In re McGee, 36 Cal.2d 592, 226 P.2d 1 (1951); Lee v. Lancaster, 262 So.2d 124 (La.App.1972); Lund ex rel. Wilbur v. Pratt, 308 A.2d 554 (Me.1973); Opinion of Justices to the Senate, 375 Mass. 795, 376 N.E.2d 810 (19......
  • LaCaze v. Johnson, 10187
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • November 13, 1974
    ...was reserved unto the Louisiana House of Representatives by virtue of Article 23, above. In the recent case of Lee v. Lancaster, 262 So.2d 124 (4 La.App.1972), the court held that Article 3, Section 10 of our present Constitution provides that a court is without jurisdiction to inquire into......
  • Gerald v. Louisiana State Senate, 14740
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • December 22, 1981
    ...affairs of the legislative body, particularly with reference to its make-up and discipline of its membership. "In Lee v. Lancaster, 262 So.2d 124, (La.App. 4th Cir. 1972), the court held that where the constitutional article providing that each House shall be the judge of the qualifications......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT