Lee v. Offshore Logistical & Transp., L.L.C.

Decision Date09 June 2017
Docket NumberNo. 16-31049,16-31049
Citation859 F.3d 353
Parties Elwood LEE, Plaintiff–Appellant v. OFFSHORE LOGISTICAL AND TRANSPORT, L.L.C., Defendant–Appellee
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Megan Cole Misko, Timothy John Young, Esq., Young Firm, New Orleans, LA, for PlaintiffAppellant.

William B. Schwartz, Alex S. Aughtry, Baldwin Haspel Burke & Mayer, L.L.C., New Orleans, LA, for DefendantAppellee.

Before REAVLEY, HAYNES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

HAYNES, Circuit Judge:

Elwood Lee ("Lee") appeals the summary judgment entered against him in favor of Offshore Logistical & Transports LLC ("Offshore") on his Jones Act and maritime claims for negligence and unseaworthiness arising out of an alleged injury Lee suffered. As explained below, we VACATE and REMAND for reconsideration in light of the current Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56.

We give only a brief discussion of the facts, because this appeal turns on the procedural ruling of the district court. Lee claims that he was employed by Offshore on its vessel, the M/V BALTY. He states that he fell while walking on the decks of the vessel. Offshore filed a motion for summary judgment challenging various aspects of Lee's proof. Ultimately, the district court concluded that Lee failed to bring forward evidence that would support a finding of causation between Offshore's acts or omissions and Lee's injuries. In so doing, the district court discounted as inadmissible the signed but unsworn report of Captain James P. Jamison which Lee filed in the record. The district court did not make a finding that the report could not be placed in admissible form.

In discounting Captain Jamison's opinions, the district court relied on a prior version of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and cases thereunder, specifically old Rule 56(e) regarding affidavits. In 2010, Rule 56 was amended to clarify and streamline the procedures regarding summary judgment motions and to make clear the process for supporting assertions of fact and objecting thereto. See FED. R. CIV. P. 56, advisory committee's note to 2010 amendment ("Subdivision (c) is new. It establishes a common procedure for several aspects of summary-judgment motions...."). Rule 56(c)(1) was amended to state as follows:

(1) Supporting Factual Positions . A party asserting that a fact cannot be or is genuinely disputed must support the assertion by:
(A) citing to particular parts of materials in the record, including depositions, documents, electronically stored information, affidavits or declarations, stipulations (including those made for purposes of the motion only), admissions, interrogatory answers, or other materials....

FED. R. CIV. P. 56(c)(1)(A).

"Although the substance or content of the evidence submitted to support or dispute a fact on summary judgment must be admissible ..., the material may be presented in a form that would not, in itself, be admissible at trial." 11 MOORE'S FEDERAL PRACTICE–CIVIL ¶ 56.91 (2017); see also Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 1 v. City of Camden , 842 F.3d 231, 238 (3d Cir. 2016) (holding that a "proponent need only ‘explain the admissible form that is anticipated’ " (quoting FED. R. CIV. P. 56, advisory committee's note to 2010 amendment)); Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. v. Lessard Design, Inc. , 790 F.3d 532, 538 (4th Cir. 2015) (recognizing that a "court may consider ... the content or substance of otherwise inadmissible materials where the ‘the party submitting the evidence show[s] that it will be possible to put the information ... into an admissible form.’ " (alteration in original) (quoting 11 JAMES WM. MOORE ET AL., MOORE'S FEDERAL PRACTICE–CIVIL ¶ 56.91[2] (3d ed. 2015))); Jones v. UPS Ground Freight , 683 F.3d 1283, 1293–94 (11th Cir. 2012) (determining that a district court may consider a statement "if the statement could be reduced to admissible evidence at trial or reduced to admissible form." (citation omitted)).

Thus, the rule expressly contemplates that affidavits are only one way to "support" a fact; "documents ... declarations, [and] other materials" are also supportive of facts. FED. R. CIV. P. 56(c)(1)(A). To avoid the use of materials that lack authenticity or violate other evidentiary...

To continue reading

Request your trial
246 cases
  • Nucor Corp. v. Requenez
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • January 4, 2022
    ...through unsworn declarations, provided their contents can be presented in admissible form at trial"); Lee v. Offshore Logistical & Transp., L.L.C. , 859 F.3d 353, 355 (5th Cir. 2017) (holding that a proponent may present evidence that is not, in itself, admissible at trial if the evidence c......
  • Hicks v. BP Exploration & Prod., Inc., CIVIL ACTION No. 17–2275
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • April 5, 2018
    ......, the material may be presented in a form that would not, in itself, be admissible at trial." Lee v. Offshore Logistical & Transp., LLC , 859 F.3d 353, 355 (5th Cir. 2017) (quoting 11 Moore's Federal Practice–Civil ¶ 56.91 (2017) ). "This flexibility allows the court to consider the evid......
  • Gordon v. New England Cent. R.R.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Vermont
    • October 10, 2019
    ...admissible, "the material may be presented in a form that would not, in itself, be admissible at trial." Lee v. Offshore Logistical & Transp., L.L.C., 859 F.3d 353, 355 (5th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation marks omitted).2 Rule 56(c)of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure affords the opposin......
  • Parrish v. Premier Directional Drilling, L.P.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Texas
    • November 27, 2017
    ...need not be authenticated or otherwise presented in an admissible form. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c) ; Lee v. Offshore Logistical & Transp., LLC, 859 F.3d 353, 355 (5th Cir. 2017). However, "[u]nsubstantiated assertions, improbable inferences, and unsupported speculation are not sufficient to ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT