Lee v. State
| Decision Date | 29 March 1922 |
| Docket Number | 24,007 |
| Citation | 134 N.E. 866,192 Ind. 13 |
| Parties | Lee v. State of Indiana |
| Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
From Delaware Circuit Court; William A. Thompson, Judge.
Prosecution by the State of Indiana against Charles Lee. From a judgment of conviction, the defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
John J. O'Neill, for appellant.
U. S. Lesh, Attorney-General, and Mrs. Edward Franklin White, for the state.
Appellant was convicted in the city court of Muncie for a violation of § 4, Acts 1917 p. 15, § 8356a et seq. Burns' Supp. 1918. He appealed to the circuit court and was again convicted.
In the circuit court he pleaded in abatement, that the grand jury was in session when the affidavit was filed in the city court. A demurrer was sustained to this plea. This plea is based on the following section of our statutes:
"All public offenses, except treason and murder, may be prosecuted in the circuit or criminal court, by affidavit filed in term time, in all cases except when the grand jury is in session or a prosecution by indictment or affidavit for the same offense is pending at the time of the filing of such affidavit." § 1989 Burns 1914, Acts 1905 p. 584, § 118.
Appellant's contention is that he had a right to have this grand jury pass upon the question of whether a charge should be lodged against him. No one has such right further than is clearly given by statute; for all the right there is in this behalf is purely legislative.
The Constitution provides that the legislature "may modify or abolish the grand jury system." § 17, Art. 7. For a cursory history of legislative modification of the grand jury system, see State v. Roberts (1906), 166 Ind. 585, 590, 591, 77 N.E. 1093.
The right being purely legislative, the above statute must be confined to cases filed in circuit and criminal courts, which have power to call and empanel grand juries
Analogous cases are found which were decided when affidavit and information were required. It was then held that one who was prosecuted and convicted on an affidavit before a justice of the peace could be tried on appeal on that affidavit without an information. Pratt v. State (1856), 7 Ind. 625; Wachstetter v. State (1873), 42 Ind. 166; Hosea v. State (1874), 47 Ind. 180.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
King v. State, 29436
...abolished and limited by statute. Art. 7, § 17, Indiana Constitution. State v. Roberts, 1906, 166 Ind. 585, 77 N.E. 1093; Lee v. State, 1922, 192 Ind. 13, 134 N.E. 866. There is a long line of decisions in this state holding that the trial court will not inquire into the competency of evide......
-
State v. Swafford
...with Article 7, § 17, this Court has held the right to a grand jury indictment to be legislative and not constitutional. Lee v. State (1922), 192 Ind. 13, 134 N.E. 866; Sisk v. State (1953), 232 Ind. 214, 110 N.E.2d We must conclude then, that the affidavit brought here was permissible and ......
-
State ex rel. Poindexter v. Reeves
...Mayor at the time the affidavit was filed in the Circuit Court would not deprive the Circuit Court of jurisdiction. In Lee v. State, 1922, 192 Ind. 13, 134 N.E. 866, the defendant was convicted in the City Court of Muncie of a violation of the liquor laws. He appealed to the Circuit Court a......
-
Cincinnati, Indianapolis and Western Railroad Company v. Board of Commissioners of Fayette County
... ... through appellant's railroad embankment at a new ... location, and from improving such highway by grading and ... graveling it. The second amended and supplemental complaint ... was in a single paragraph. A demurrer by each of the ... appellees for the alleged reason that it did not state facts ... sufficient to constitute a cause of action was sustained to ... this complaint and the appellant excepted, and assigns these ... rulings as error ... The ... substance of the complaint is as follows: That seventy-six ... persons, describing themselves as ... ...