Lee v. Turner

Citation14 S.W. 505,89 Mo. 489
PartiesLEE et al. v. TURNER et al.<SMALL><SUP>1</SUP></SMALL>
Decision Date01 April 1886
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

At the maturity of a negotiable note for $9,000, secured by trust-deed, the land was sold under a power of sale, and purchased by the payee of the note, who indorsed on it: "Credited by proceeds of trustee's sale this day, $4,633.08." The payee then indorsed it, without recourse, to one who agreed by a separate writing to collect the balance due for one-half the proceeds, and to return the note if not collected. The indorsee transferred it as collateral for a loan of $3,000 advanced by R., who had knowledge of the sale under the trust-deed, and of the purchase by the payee, but no notice of the terms on which he had indorsed the note. The sale under the trust-deed proving void, the land was again sold for $12,000. Held, that R. was entitled to the $3,000 advanced by him, with interest, out of the proceeds of the second sale.

Appeal from St. Louis court of appeals.

Petition by A. Lee and J. F. Lee in the nature of a bill of interpleader against T. T. Turner and others. Defendant Roemheld appeals.

Louis Gottschalk and Alexander Martin, for appellant. T. T. Gantt, for respondent Turner.

BLACK, J.

The petition in this case is in the nature of a bill of interpleader. The defendants, Thomas T. Turner, R. M. Million, and William Roemheld, each made claim to the fund brought into court. Their respective claims arise out of the following transactions: On the 22d day of February, 1876, one Rohn made to the plaintiffs, A. and J. F. Lee, a deed of trust on certain property in the city of St. Louis to secure a note made by Rohn for $9,000, due in three years, payable to Turner as trustee for Mrs. Briggs, and to secure six interest notes. There was a default in the payment of the principal note, and some of the interest notes, and on the 10th of March, 1879, the trustees sold the property, and Turner became the purchaser at $6,000. This sale paid the interest notes, and the trustees indorsed on the principal note a credit of the residue of the proceeds of the sale. Soon after this sale, and in April, 1879, Turner, as trustee, indorsed the note to Million without recourse. On the same day, he took back a contract, reciting the assignment and amount due upon the note, by the terms of which Million was to endeavor to collect the balance from the estate of Rohn, who died previous to the date of the trustee's sale. Million agreed to pay all the costs of litigation, and for his services was to receive one-half of the amount collected, and at the end of eight years return the note, if not collected. Million had allowed in his own name the balance due on the note by the probate court against the estate of Rohn, and in like manner prosecuted suits to set aside deeds alleged to be fraudulent, and to subject the property to the payment of this debt. In 1881, Turner contracted to sell the property which he had purchased at the trustee's sale, when an investigation of the title disclosed the fact that the trustees had only advertised the property for sale for 20 days. The trust-deed required 30. Thereupon, Turner directed the trustees to readvertise and sell the property again, which they proceeded to do. While the property was thus being readvertised, Roemheld loaned Million $3,000, to become due in one year, and as security took an assignment of the Rohn note, which was then in the possession of Million. The resale was temporarily enjoined, and in 1882 the trustees again sold the property at public sale for $12,000, and this is the fund in dispute. The circuit court found and decreed that Roemheld was entitled to be paid $3,000, and the interest thereon, and that Turner should have the residue. This judgment was reversed in the court of appeals, and Roemheld prosecutes this appeal from that judgment.

As between Turner and Million there...

To continue reading

Request your trial
29 cases
  • Schrader v. Westport Avenue Bank
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 1 Diciembre 1941
    ... ... 24 Ruling Case Law, page 378; The International Bank v. The German Bank, 71 Mo. 183; Neuhoff v. O'Reilly, 93 Mo. 164; Lawless et al. v. Guelbreth, 8 Mo. 139; DePew v. Robards, 17 Mo. 580; Lee v. Turner, 89 Mo. 489; 8 Am. Juris. 1030-1031; 19 Am. Juris. 698-699-700; Citizens Bank v. Mutual Trust & Dep. Co. (Ky.), 266 S.W. 875; Nat'l Safe Dep. Co. v. Hibbs, 229 U.S. 391; Austin v. Heyden, 171 Mich. 38; Johnson v. Bixby, 252 Fed. 103. (2) The court should not have assessed the damages at $3,440, the ... ...
  • Pierpoint v. Prudential Ins. Co., 38092.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 4 Enero 1943
    ... ... Scott v. First Natl. Bank of St. Louis, 119 S.W. (2d) 929; Ginter v. Commerce Trust Co., 14 S.W. (2d) 41; Edmonson v. Waterston, 119 S.W. (2d) 318; Baade v. Cramer, 213 S.W. 121; Neuhoff v. O'Reilly, 93 Mo. 164; Lee v. Turner, 89 Mo. 489; Miller v. People's Savs. Bank, 193 Mo. App. 498; Goddard Grocer Co. v. Freedman, 127 S.W. (2d) 759; Klebba v. Struemph, 23 S.W. (2d) 205; M.M. Securities Co. v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 76 S.W. (2d) 521. (4) The written endorsement of a promissory note by James E. Pierpoint, ... ...
  • Pierpoint v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 4 Enero 1943
    ... ... assert to the contrary and is bound thereby. Scott v ... First Natl. Bank of St. Louis, 119 S.W.2d 929; ... Ginter v. Commerce Trust Co., 14 S.W.2d 41; ... Edmonson v. Waterston, 119 S.W.2d 318; Baade v ... Cramer, 213 S.W. 121; Neuhoff v. O'Reilly, ... 93 Mo. 164; Lee v. Turner, 89 Mo. 489; Miller v ... People's Savs. Bank, 193 Mo.App. 498; Goddard ... Grocer Co. v. Freedman, 127 S.W.2d 759; Klebba v ... Struemph, 23 S.W.2d 205; M. M. Securities Co. v ... General Motors Acceptance Corp., 76 S.W.2d 521. (4) The ... written endorsement of a promissory note ... ...
  • Schrader v. Westport Ave. Bank
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • 16 Junio 1941
    ... ... wrongdoer. 24 Ruling Case Law, page 378; The ... International Bank v. The German Bank, 71 Mo. 183; ... Neuhoff v. O'Reilly, 93 Mo. 164; Lawless et ... al. v. Guelbreth, 8 Mo. 139; DePew v. Robards, ... 17 Mo. 580; Lee v. Turner, 89 Mo. 489; 8 Am. Juris ... 1030-1031; 19 Am. Juris. 698-699-700; Citizens Bank v ... Mutual Trust & Dep. Co. (Ky.), 266 S.W. 875; ... Nat'l Safe Dep. Co. v. Hibbs, 229 U.S. 391; ... Austin v. Heyden, 171 Mich. 38; Johnson v ... Bixby, 252 F. 103. (2) The court should not have ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT