Lee v. Von Weise, Case Number: 1607

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
Writing for the CourtAMES, C.
Citation1912 OK 7,121 P. 250,32 Okla. 114
PartiesBALLINGER & LEE et al. v. VON WEISE.
Docket NumberCase Number: 1607
Decision Date09 January 1912

1912 OK 7
121 P. 250
32 Okla. 114

BALLINGER & LEE et al.
v.
VON WEISE.

Case Number: 1607

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided: January 9, 1912


Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR-- Review--Necessity of Case-Made. Errors not arising on the record proper cannot be considered in this court, unless the proceedings are brought to this court by a case-made, served within the time allowed by law or fixed by the order of the court.

Error from Carter County Court; I. R. Mason, Judge.

Action by Charles Von Weise against Ballinger & Lee, to recover damages on account of breach of contract. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Affirmed.

AMES, C.

¶1 The motion for new trial in this case was overruled on December 11th, and sixty days were allowed within which to serve the case-made. The case-made was served on February 11th. No extension of time was procured, and therefore the case was not served within the time fixed by the court. We cannot therefore consider errors not appearing on the record proper, and, as none of the errors assigned arise on the record proper, the case should be affirmed.

¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Gourley v. Williams, Case Number: 4276
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • May 25, 1915
    ...petition in error and transcript, and therefore we can consider only such questions as arise on the record proper. Ballinger v. Von Weise, 32 Okla. 114, 121 P. 250. The first two errors assigned in the petition in error will be considered together, as they both raise the question whether on......
  • Homeland Realty Co. v. Robison, Case Number: 2934
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • November 11, 1913
    ...P. 906; St. L. & S. F. R. Co. v. McCollum, 23 Okla. 899, 101 P. 1120; McCoy v. McCoy, 27 Okla. 371, 112 P. 1040; Ballinger v. Von Weise, 32 Okla. 114, 121 P. 250. We do not exactly understand what the appellant means in this assignment of error, when he gives as a reason why it ought to be ......
  • Ballinger & Lee v. Von Weise
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • January 9, 1912
    ...250 32 Okla. 114, 1912 OK 7 BALLINGER & LEE et al. v. VON WEISE. Supreme Court of OklahomaJanuary 9, Syllabus by the Court. Errors not arising on the record proper cannot be considered in this court, unless the proceedings are brought to this court by a case-made, served within the time all......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT