Lee v. Washington
Decision Date | 11 March 1968 |
Docket Number | No. 75,75 |
Citation | 390 U.S. 333,88 S.Ct. 994,19 L.Ed.2d 1212 |
Parties | Frank LEE, Commissioner of Corrections of Alabama et al., Appellants, v. Caliph WASHINGTON et al |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Nicholas S. Hare, for appellants.
Charles Morgan, Jr., for appellees.
This appeal challenges a decree of a three-judge District Court declaring that certain Alabama statutes violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the extent that they require segregation of the races in prisons and jails, and establishing a schedule for desegregation of these institutions. The State's contentions that Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which relates to class actions, was violated in this case and that the challenged statutes are not unconstitutional are without merit. The remaining contention of the State is that the specific orders directing desegregation of prisons and jails make no allowance for the necessities of prison security and discipline, but we do not so read the 'Order, Judgment and Decree' of the District Court, which when read as a whole we find unexceptionable.
The judgment is affirmed.
In joining the opinion of the Court, we wish to make explicit something that is left to be gathered only by implication from the Court's opinions. This is that prison authorities have the right, acting in good faith and in particularized circumstances, to take into account racial tensions in maintaining security, discipline, and good order in prisons and jails. We are unwilling to assume that state or local prison authorities might mistakenly regard such an explicit pronouncement as evincing any dilution of this Court's firm commitment to the Fourteenth Amendment's prohibition of racial discrimination.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Palmigiano v. Garrahy
...Jail v. Eisenstadt, supra; Morales v. Turman, supra; Washington v. Lee, 263 F.Supp. 327 (M.D.Ala.1966), aff'd, 390 U.S. 333, 88 S.Ct. 994, 19 L.Ed.2d 1212 (1968) (per curiam); Davis v. Watkins, 384 F.Supp. 1196 (N.D. Ohio 1976); Rhem v. Malcolm, 371 F.Supp. 594 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd and remande......
-
Nadeau v. Helgemoe
...of Equal Protection of the law. Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 556, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 945 (1974); Lee v. Washington, 390 U.S. 333, 88 S.Ct. 994, 19 L.Ed.2d 1212 (1968); Sweet, supra, 529 F.2d at 859; Fortune Society v. McGinnis, 319 F.Supp. 901, 904 (S.D.N.Y. 1970). Defendants' a......
-
Peoples v. State
...e.g., Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817, 94 S.Ct. 2800, 41 L.Ed.2d 495 (1974) (freedom of speech and religion); Lee v. Washington, 390 U.S. 333, 88 S.Ct. 994, 19 L.Ed.2d 1212 (1968) (racially invidious discrimination); Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974) (no......
-
Wallace v. Brewer
...were in exclusive control of printing election ballots); Washington v. Lee, 263 F.Supp. 327 (M.D.Ala.1967), aff'd, 390 U.S. 333, 88 S.Ct. 994, 19 L.Ed. 2d 1212 (1968) (plaintiffs sought desegregation of State penal system and county and city jails; class composed of all wardens, jailers and......
-
Procreation and the prisoner: does the right to procreate survive incarceration and do legitimate penological interests justify restrictions on the exercise of the right.
...free exercise of religion is retained during incarceration). (62.) Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 824-25 (1977). (63.) Lee v. Washington, 390 U.S. 333 (1968) (per curiam) (prisoners retain the equal protection right to be free of invidious racial (64.) Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817, 822 (......
-
The Equal Protection Clause
...of his or her race, color, religion, sex, national origin, sexual orientation or similar grounds."). [309] See, e.g., Lee v. Washington, 390 U.S. 333 (1968). [310] 543 U.S. 499, 502 (2005). [311] Id. at 507-08 (some citations omitted). [312] Id. at 1152 (Rehnquist, C.J., took no part in the......
-
Table of Cases
...165 L.Ed.2d 609 (2006), 1150, 1627-28 Leathers v. Medlock, 499 U.S. 439, 111 S.Ct. 1438, 113 L.Ed.2d 494 (1991), 1429 Lee v. Washington, 390 U.S. 333, 88 S.Ct. 994, 19 L.Ed.2d 1212 (1968), Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577, 112 S.Ct. 2649, 120 L.Ed.2d 467 (1992), 95, 116, 156, 209, 364, 389-91, ......
-
CHAPTER 5 TYPES OF COGNIZABLE CLAIMS
...courtroom door. Hill v. Texas, 316 U.S. 400, 406 (1942). Nor is equal protection denied to persons convicted of crimes. Lee v. Washington, 390 U.S. 333 (1968). The Court in the past has found that racial discrimination within the criminal justice system is particularly abhorrent: "Discrimin......