Lee v. Washington

Decision Date11 March 1968
Docket NumberNo. 75,75
Citation390 U.S. 333,88 S.Ct. 994,19 L.Ed.2d 1212
PartiesFrank LEE, Commissioner of Corrections of Alabama et al., Appellants, v. Caliph WASHINGTON et al
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Nicholas S. Hare, for appellants.

Charles Morgan, Jr., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal challenges a decree of a three-judge District Court declaring that certain Alabama statutes violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the extent that they require segregation of the races in prisons and jails, and establishing a schedule for desegregation of these institutions. The State's contentions that Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which relates to class actions, was violated in this case and that the challenged statutes are not unconstitutional are without merit. The remaining contention of the State is that the specific orders directing desegregation of prisons and jails make no allowance for the necessities of prison security and discipline, but we do not so read the 'Order, Judgment and Decree' of the District Court, which when read as a whole we find unexceptionable.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice BLACK, Mr. Justice HARLAN, and Mr. Justice STEWART, concurring.

In joining the opinion of the Court, we wish to make explicit something that is left to be gathered only by implication from the Court's opinions. This is that prison authorities have the right, acting in good faith and in particularized circumstances, to take into account racial tensions in maintaining security, discipline, and good order in prisons and jails. We are unwilling to assume that state or local prison authorities might mistakenly regard such an explicit pronouncement as evincing any dilution of this Court's firm commitment to the Fourteenth Amendment's prohibition of racial discrimination.

To continue reading

Request your trial
337 cases
  • Palmigiano v. Garrahy
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Rhode Island
    • 10 Agosto 1977
    ...Jail v. Eisenstadt, supra; Morales v. Turman, supra; Washington v. Lee, 263 F.Supp. 327 (M.D.Ala.1966), aff'd, 390 U.S. 333, 88 S.Ct. 994, 19 L.Ed.2d 1212 (1968) (per curiam); Davis v. Watkins, 384 F.Supp. 1196 (N.D. Ohio 1976); Rhem v. Malcolm, 371 F.Supp. 594 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd and remande......
  • Nadeau v. Helgemoe
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Hampshire
    • 6 Diciembre 1976
    ...of Equal Protection of the law. Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 556, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 945 (1974); Lee v. Washington, 390 U.S. 333, 88 S.Ct. 994, 19 L.Ed.2d 1212 (1968); Sweet, supra, 529 F.2d at 859; Fortune Society v. McGinnis, 319 F.Supp. 901, 904 (S.D.N.Y. 1970). Defendants' a......
  • Peoples v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 27 Mayo 1986
    ...e.g., Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817, 94 S.Ct. 2800, 41 L.Ed.2d 495 (1974) (freedom of speech and religion); Lee v. Washington, 390 U.S. 333, 88 S.Ct. 994, 19 L.Ed.2d 1212 (1968) (racially invidious discrimination); Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974) (no......
  • Wallace v. Brewer
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Alabama
    • 9 Junio 1970
    ...were in exclusive control of printing election ballots); Washington v. Lee, 263 F.Supp. 327 (M.D.Ala.1967), aff'd, 390 U.S. 333, 88 S.Ct. 994, 19 L.Ed. 2d 1212 (1968) (plaintiffs sought desegregation of State penal system and county and city jails; class composed of all wardens, jailers and......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
12 books & journal articles
  • Procreation and the prisoner: does the right to procreate survive incarceration and do legitimate penological interests justify restrictions on the exercise of the right.
    • United States
    • Fordham Urban Law Journal Vol. 29 No. 6, August 2002
    • 1 Agosto 2002
    ...free exercise of religion is retained during incarceration). (62.) Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 824-25 (1977). (63.) Lee v. Washington, 390 U.S. 333 (1968) (per curiam) (prisoners retain the equal protection right to be free of invidious racial (64.) Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817, 822 (......
  • The Equal Protection Clause
    • United States
    • The Path of Constitutional Law Part IV: The Final Cause Of Constitutional Law Sub-Part Three: Civil War Amendments And Due Process Generally
    • 1 Enero 2007
    ...of his or her race, color, religion, sex, national origin, sexual orientation or similar grounds."). [309] See, e.g., Lee v. Washington, 390 U.S. 333 (1968). [310] 543 U.S. 499, 502 (2005). [311] Id. at 507-08 (some citations omitted). [312] Id. at 1152 (Rehnquist, C.J., took no part in the......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • The Path of Constitutional Law Suplemmentary Materials
    • 1 Enero 2007
    ...165 L.Ed.2d 609 (2006), 1150, 1627-28 Leathers v. Medlock, 499 U.S. 439, 111 S.Ct. 1438, 113 L.Ed.2d 494 (1991), 1429 Lee v. Washington, 390 U.S. 333, 88 S.Ct. 994, 19 L.Ed.2d 1212 (1968), Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577, 112 S.Ct. 2649, 120 L.Ed.2d 467 (1992), 95, 116, 156, 209, 364, 389-91, ......
  • CHAPTER 5 TYPES OF COGNIZABLE CLAIMS
    • United States
    • Carolina Academic Press Federal Habeas Corpus: Cases and Materials (CAP)
    • Invalid date
    ...courtroom door. Hill v. Texas, 316 U.S. 400, 406 (1942). Nor is equal protection denied to persons convicted of crimes. Lee v. Washington, 390 U.S. 333 (1968). The Court in the past has found that racial discrimination within the criminal justice system is particularly abhorrent: "Discrimin......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT