Leeds v. Department of Commerce, 89-3265

Decision Date11 September 1989
Docket NumberNo. 89-3265,89-3265
Citation887 F.2d 1095
PartiesUnpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Jackson LEEDS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Respondent.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Federal Circuit

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, SKELTON, Senior Judge, and NIES, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Leeds v. Mosbacher
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • February 13, 1990
    ...States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia later affirmed the termination decision without opinion. Leeds v. Department of Commerce, 887 F.2d 1095 (Fed.Cir.1989). On May 24, 1989, two months after plaintiff had supplemented his application, plaintiff's attorney requested OED to "i......
  • Swope v. U.S. Postal Service, 89-3246
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Federal Circuit
    • September 11, 1989

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT