Lehigh Valley Coal Sales Co. v. Maguire
| Decision Date | 05 March 1918 |
| Docket Number | 2503. |
| Citation | 251 F. 581 |
| Parties | LEHIGH VALLEY COAL SALES CO. v. MAGUIRE. In re GILMORE-THAYER CO. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
Rehearing Denied April 19, 1918.
Frederic Ullmann, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Raymond Visser, of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.
Before BAKER, ALSCHULER, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.
During the summer and fall of 1915 the bankrupt became largely indebted to appellant on open account for coal. Appellant learning that the bankrupt was in financial straits, refused to ship any more coal unless paid for in advance. On November 29th the bankrupt sent an order to appellant for coal and a certified check for $275 in payment. At this time the bankrupt was insolvent, and appellant knew it. Creditors the next day filed their petition, under which appellee became successor to the bankrupt's estate. Appellant refused to ship coal, retained the $275, and filed a claim on its open account, crediting thereon the $275 so withheld. Appellee objected to the allowance of the claim as filed, on the ground that to permit appellant to apply the $275 upon its open account would constitute a preference. This position was sustained in the court below.
Set-offs are authorized only in cases of 'mutual debts or mutual credits.' Bankruptcy Act, July 1, 1898, c. 541, Sec. 68, 30 Stat. 565 (Comp. St. 1916, Sec. 9652). This does not enlarge or change-- it only recognizes--what under general law may constitute set-offs. In New York County Bank v. Massey, 192 U.S. 138, 24 Sup.Ct. 199, 48 L.Ed. 380, relied on by appellant, the bankrupt was indebted to the bank on his overdue notes; after he was insolvent he made a general deposit to his credit in the bank; and the bank, although its officers had reasonable cause to believe he was insolvent when he made the deposit was permitted, after bankruptcy had intervened, to set off its notes against the deposit. As the general deposit created only the relation of debtor and creditor, this was clearly a case of mutual debts and credits. But where a creditor receives money from his debtor, with instructions not to apply it on the debt, but to hold or use it for a specific purpose, the right of set-off does not exist, because the creditor has become, not the debtor of his debtor, but the trustee of a specific trust. This principle is illustrated in Libby v. Hopkins, 104 U.S. 303, 26 L.Ed. 769. There the debtor owed his...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc.
...debtor, the true owner of the trust res, and did not have a mutual debt which could be offset); Lehigh Valley Coal Sales Co. v. Maguire (In re Gilmore-Thayer Co.), 251 F. 581 (7th Cir.1918) (creditor who received payment from the bankrupt for a new order for coal could not apply the payment......
-
Skinner v. WT Grant Co., Civ. A. No. 73-3257
...& Gas Co. v. Logan, 92 F.2d 28, 32 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 302 U.S. 763, 58 S.Ct. 409, 82 L.Ed. 592 (1937); Lehigh Valley Coal Sales Co. v. Maguire, 251 F. 581 (7th Cir. 1918). By the express terms of section 68(a), set-offs attach not to the property which is the subject matter of the cl......
-
In re World Access, Inc.
...& Loan Co. (In re Bevill, Bresler & Schulman Asset Management Corp.), 896 F.2d 54 (3d Cir.1990); see also Lehigh Valley Coal Sales Co. v. Maguire, 251 F. 581, 582 (7th Cir.1918) ("where a creditor receives money from his debtor, with instructions not to apply it on the debt, but to hold or ......
-
Fore Improvement Corporation v. Selig
...537; Libby v. Hopkins, 1881, 104 U.S. 303, 26 L.Ed. 769; United States v. Roth, 2 Cir., 1948, 164 F.2d 575; Lehigh Valley Coal Sales Co. v. Maguire, 7 Cir., 1918, 251 F. 581; Morris v. Windsor Trust Co., 1914, 213 N.Y. 27, 106 N.E. 753. See Comment, Bankruptcy: Mutuality as a Requirement fo......